IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/millen/v13y2022i2p225-242.html

Responsibility to Protect and Rising Asian Powers

Author

Listed:
  • Tor Dahl-Eriksen

Abstract

Responsibility to Protect (R2P) is the national and international responsibility to protect populations against mass atrocities. This article discusses prospects for the implementation of R2P objectives in a world where Asian powers rise. It focuses not only on prevention and assistance but also decisive action, the most controversial aspect of R2P, tied to the UN Security Council where China resides as a permanent member with a veto. The Indian R2P position also highlights, supplemented with some comments, on selected East Asian states. It concludes that the rise of Asian powers does not threaten the national responsibility to protect. Voluntary international assistance is not threatened, but assistance with coercive elements might be. Unless more clear criteria are established for the possible use of military force, mandates from the Security Council which allows this will probably be rare. Particularly, China will oppose interventions that may forward regime change in targeted states.

Suggested Citation

  • Tor Dahl-Eriksen, 2022. "Responsibility to Protect and Rising Asian Powers," Millennial Asia, , vol. 13(2), pages 225-242, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:millen:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:225-242
    DOI: 10.1177/0976399621989464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0976399621989464
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0976399621989464?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Binder, Martin, 2015. "Paths to intervention: What explains the UN’s selective response to humanitarian crises?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 52(6), pages 712-726.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katharina Meissner, 2023. "How to sanction international wrongdoing? The design of EU restrictive measures," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 61-85, January.
    2. Anja Jetschke & Bernd Schlipphak, 2020. "MILINDA: A new dataset on United Nations-led and non-united Nations-led peace operations," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(5), pages 605-629, September.
    3. Aaron Opdyke & Amy Javernick-Will & Matthew Koschmann, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis of Coordination, Participation, and Training in Post-Disaster Shelter Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:millen:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:225-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.