IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/metjou/v24y2025i1p90-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Crisis History and Media Framing on Customers Perception in Business Management: A Study of Boeing

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Sherrick Apambila
  • Janet Anani Laadi
  • Margaret Nana Yaa Asare
  • Clementina Edema

Abstract

In our globally connected era, organizational crises can unfold rapidly, demanding swift and effective communication strategies. Crisis communication, a critical aspect of public relations, can significantly influence an organization’s ability to navigate difficult times and maintain its reputation. This case study examines Boeing’s crisis communication and the company’s reputation management following the January 2024 incident where a door panel blew off an Alaska Airlines 737-9 MAX aircraft mid-flight. This article analyses two historical crises in comparison with Boeing’s initial communication failures, including delayed and inadequate responses that lacked transparency and empathy. It evaluates media coverage across traditional and social media platforms, revealing predominantly negative framing that highlighted safety concerns and eroded public trust in Boeing. The analysis applies crisis communication theories, particularly situational crisis communication and image restoration theory (IRT) to assess Boeing’s actions. Key findings include the amplification of the crisis through media coverage, and the lasting impact on Boeing’s reputation and financial performance. This article concludes with recommendations for Boeing to overhaul its management, re-evaluate supplier relationships, and prioritize transparent communication to rebuild stakeholder trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Sherrick Apambila & Janet Anani Laadi & Margaret Nana Yaa Asare & Clementina Edema, 2025. "The Impact of Crisis History and Media Framing on Customers Perception in Business Management: A Study of Boeing," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 24(1), pages 90-104, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:metjou:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:90-104
    DOI: 10.1177/09726225251316631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09726225251316631
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09726225251316631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:metjou:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:90-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.