IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v9y1989i4p243-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lens Model Analysis of Hemodynamic status in the critically III

Author

Listed:
  • Theodore Speroff
  • Alfred F. Connors JR.
  • Neal V. Dawson

Abstract

The lens model recently has been extended to consider multiple outcomes and sequential use of clinical information. The authors have used this extended model 1) to describe the relationship between clinical information and physicians' assessments of hemodynamic sta tus, 2) to describe the empirical relationship between clinical information and physiologic measures of hemodynamic status, and 3) to compare physicians' use of information with its empirical utility. Physicians prospectively provided estimates of cardiac index and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure for 440 intensive care unit patients prior to right heart catheteri zation. The correlation between physicians' estimates and measured hemodynamic status was lower than that between clinical information and hemodynamic status (0.42 versus 0.67). Only 7% of physicians' judgment was related to subsequent ancillary testing. Empirically, subsequent ancillary testing contributed 30% to the explanation of hemodynamic status. The lens model describes limitations of physician judgment in estimating left ventricular function and helps explain how patient features relate to measured hemodynamic status. Key words: lens model; social judgment theory; physician judgment; hemodynamic status. (Med Decis Making 1989;9:243-252)

Suggested Citation

  • Theodore Speroff & Alfred F. Connors JR. & Neal V. Dawson, 1989. "Lens Model Analysis of Hemodynamic status in the critically III," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 9(4), pages 243-252, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:9:y:1989:i:4:p:243-252
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8900900403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X8900900403
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X8900900403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:9:y:1989:i:4:p:243-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.