Author
Abstract
A sequential method for diagnosing or excluding hypertension based on the Bayesian model of diastolic blood pressure presented in a companion article is presented. The likelihood ratio method of Wald is modified to include the effects of a prior probability distribution and to constrain the strategy to achieve specified positive and negative predictive values. The resulting formulas for upper and lower limits to diagnose and exclude diastolic hypertension can be evaluated using a hand calculator and a table of areas of the standard normal distribution. The strategy is illustrated for a population having a blood pressure distribution similar to that of the cohort screened for participation in the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program, with 90 mm Hg as the cutoff defining hypertension and required positive and negative predictive values of 95%. The performance of the strategy was simulated using Monte Carlo methods. The median number of readings required for diagnosis is three, and 80% of subjects are diagnosed in 11 or fewer readings. In contrast to the strategy's 95% predictive values, a fixed-number-of-measurements strategy requiring the same mean num ber of measurements has a positive predictive value of only 83% and a negative predictive value of 96%. When the parameters of the model have been properly measured or estimated, this method is practical, efficient, and accurate for diagnosing hypertension in a known population. Key words: Bayes' theorem; sequential analysis; hypertension diagnosis. (Med Decis Making 8:191-196, 1988)
Suggested Citation
Clyde B. Schechter, 1988.
"Sequential Analysis in a Bayesian Model of Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurement,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 8(3), pages 191-196, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:8:y:1988:i:3:p:191-196
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800307
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:8:y:1988:i:3:p:191-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.