IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v46y2026i6p716-729.html

Visualization of Multi-indication Randomized Control Trial Evidence to Support Decision Making in Oncology: A Case Study on Bevacizumab

Author

Listed:
  • Sumayya Anwer

    (Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK)

  • Janharpreet Singh

    (Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK)

  • Sylwia Bujkiewicz

    (Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK)

  • Anne Thomas

    (Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK)

  • Richard Adams

    (Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
    Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK)

  • Elizabeth Smyth

    (Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK)

  • Pedro Saramago

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
    Health Economics and Market Access, Evidera by PPD, Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK)

  • Stephen Palmer

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)

  • Marta O. Soares

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)

  • Sofia Dias

    (Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK)

Abstract

Background As an increasing number of oncology drugs are licensed for multiple indications, sharing information across indications may help improve the precision of estimates for a target indication where evidence may be immature. Visualizing the accumulation of evidence and its characteristics across all indications can help inform policy makers as to whether multi-indication synthesis methods should be considered and guide expert elicitation on appropriate cross-indication assumptions. Methods The multi-indication oncology drug bevacizumab was selected as a case study. We used visualization methods including timeline, ridgeline, and split-violin plots to display evidence and synthesis results across 7 licensed cancer types, focusing on the evidence on overall and progression-free survival and the display of results from models with and without information sharing. Results The proposed displays allow for visualization of key characteristics of the evidence to support the assessment of heterogeneity within and across indications and inform the feasibility of information-sharing models. Limitations The lack of consistent reporting of data in trial reports limits the visualization of some study characteristics. Tradeoffs between plot readability and the level of detail to include were required. Conclusions Clear graphical representations of the evolution and accumulation of evidence and synthesis results can provide a better understanding of the entire multi-indication evidence base, which can inform judgments regarding the appropriate use of data within and across indications. Interactive plots could help overcome some of the current limitations. Implications The proposed displays should be used to facilitate discussion with experts on the judgments required to assess the feasibility of using information-sharing methods to improve the estimation of relative treatment effects in evidence synthesis approaches and health technology assessment. Highlights An increasing number of oncology drugs are licensed for multiple indications; we developed visualization methods for multi-indication evidence that consider key characteristics unique to oncology. Graphical displays can be used to show the evolution of evidence within and across multiple indications. Clear evidence visualizations can be used as a tool to support evidence synthesis approaches, support policy makers, or guide expert elicitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumayya Anwer & Janharpreet Singh & Sylwia Bujkiewicz & Anne Thomas & Richard Adams & Elizabeth Smyth & Pedro Saramago & Stephen Palmer & Marta O. Soares & Sofia Dias, 2026. "Visualization of Multi-indication Randomized Control Trial Evidence to Support Decision Making in Oncology: A Case Study on Bevacizumab," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 46(6), pages 716-729, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:46:y:2026:i:6:p:716-729
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X261430333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X261430333
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X261430333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:46:y:2026:i:6:p:716-729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.