Author
Listed:
- Dina Jankovic
(Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)
- James Horscroft
(Maple Health Group, New York, USA)
- Dawn Lee
(Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK)
- Laura Bojke
(Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)
- Marta Soares
(Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)
Abstract
In a landscape of accelerated approvals and a less mature evidence base, constrained health systems make reimbursement decisions based on uncertain evidence about the expected clinical and economic value of a health technology. Uncertain decisions require expert judgments, and there has recently been a drive to improve the accountability and transparency in the way these judgments are collected and reported. Structured expert elicitation (SEE) refers to formal methods to quantify experts’ judgments. Protocols for conducting SEE exist; however, the time and resource requirements of SEE and the lack of simple tools for its implementation are potential deterrents to its implementation. This article describes the development of Structured Expert Elicitation Resources (STEER), a collection of open access resources based on a published protocol for SEE specific to the health care decision-making (HCDM) setting. The resources cover the entire SEE process from design to reporting. The resources include an overview and a practical guide for conducting SEE in this setting, adaptable tools for building bespoke SEE exercises, training materials for experts taking part in SEE, resources used in previous SEE exercises, and examples of published SEE in HCDM. The materials cover practical considerations such as timelines team skills requirements, and administrative requirements such as contracting. The use of off-the-shelf resources can streamline the SEE process in HCDM while maintaining robustness. Highlights There is a drive to improve accountability and transparency in the way expert judgments are used in health care decision making; however, the time and resource requirements of SEE and the lack of simple tools for its implementation are potential deterrents to its implementation. Structured Expert Elicitation Resources (STEER) is a collection of open access resources for conducting SEE in health care decision making, based on a published methods protocol for SEE specific to this setting. The use of off-the-shelf resources can streamline the SEE process in health care decision making while maintaining robustness.
Suggested Citation
Dina Jankovic & James Horscroft & Dawn Lee & Laura Bojke & Marta Soares, 2025.
"STEER: Open Access Resources for Conducting Structured Expert Elicitation for Health Care Decision Making,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 45(6), pages 627-639, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:45:y:2025:i:6:p:627-639
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X251343013
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:45:y:2025:i:6:p:627-639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.