Author
Listed:
- Joachim Worthington
(The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia)
- Eleonora Feletto
(The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia)
- Emily He
(The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia)
- Stephen Wade
(The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia)
- Barbara de Graaff
(Menzies Institute for Medical Research, The University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia)
- Anh Le Tuan Nguyen
(Menzies Institute for Medical Research, The University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
WHO Collaborating Centre for Viral Hepatitis, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity)
- Jacob George
(Storr Liver Centre, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia)
- Karen Canfell
(School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia)
- Michael Caruana
(The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia)
Abstract
Introduction Epidemiological models benefit from incorporating detailed time-to-event data to understand how disease risk evolves. For example, decompensation risk in liver cirrhosis depends on sojourn time spent with cirrhosis. Semi-Markov and related models capture these details by modeling time-to-event distributions based on published survival data. However, implementations of semi-Markov processes rely on Monte Carlo sampling methods, which increase computational requirements and introduce stochastic variability. Explicitly calculating the evolving transition likelihood can avoid these issues and provide fast, reliable estimates. Methods We present the sojourn time density framework for computing semi-Markov and related models by calculating the evolving sojourn time probability density as a system of partial differential equations. The framework is parametrized by commonly used hazard and models the distribution of current disease state and sojourn time. We describe the mathematical background, a numerical method for computation, and an example model of liver disease. Results Models developed with the sojourn time density framework can directly incorporate time-to-event data and serial events in a deterministic system. This increases the level of potential model detail over Markov-type models, improves parameter identifiability, and reduces computational burden and stochastic uncertainty compared with Monte Carlo methods. The example model of liver disease was able to accurately reproduce targets without extensive calibration or fitting and required minimal computational burden. Conclusions Explicitly modeling sojourn time distribution allows us to represent semi-Markov systems using detailed survival data from epidemiological studies without requiring sampling, avoiding the need for calibration, reducing computational time, and allowing for more robust probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Highlights Time-inhomogeneous semi-Markov models and other time-to-event–based modeling approaches can capture risks that evolve over time spent with a disease. We describe an approach to computing these models that represents them as partial differential equations representing the evolution of the sojourn time probability density. This sojourn time density framework incorporates complex data sources on competing risks and serial events while minimizing computational complexity.
Suggested Citation
Joachim Worthington & Eleonora Feletto & Emily He & Stephen Wade & Barbara de Graaff & Anh Le Tuan Nguyen & Jacob George & Karen Canfell & Michael Caruana, 2025.
"Evaluating Semi-Markov Processes and Other Epidemiological Time-to-Event Models by Computing Disease Sojourn Density as Partial Differential Equations,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 45(5), pages 569-586, July.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:45:y:2025:i:5:p:569-586
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X251333398
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:45:y:2025:i:5:p:569-586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.