IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v45y2025i4p462-479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

People Living with Chronic Pain Experience a High Prevalence of Decision Regret in Canada: A Pan-Canadian Online Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Naye

    (School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada)

  • Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme

    (School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada)

  • Maxime Sasseville

    (VITAM Research Center for Sustainable Health, Quebec Integrated University Health and Social Services Center (CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale), QC, Canada
    Université Laval, Faculty of Nursing, QC, Canada)

  • Chloé Cachinho

    (School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
    Patient-research partner)

  • Thomas Gérard

    (School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada)

  • Karine Toupin-April

    (School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ottawa, ON, Canada
    Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, ON, Canada
    Institut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, ON, Canada)

  • Olivia Dubois

    (School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada)

  • Jean-Sébastien Paquette

    (VITAM Research Center for Sustainable Health, Quebec Integrated University Health and Social Services Center (CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale), QC, Canada
    Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Faculty of Medicine, QC, Canada)

  • Annie LeBlanc

    (VITAM Research Center for Sustainable Health, Quebec Integrated University Health and Social Services Center (CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale), QC, Canada
    Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Faculty of Medicine, QC, Canada)

  • Isabelle Gaboury

    (Université de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada)

  • Marie-Ève Poitras

    (Université de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada)

  • Linda C. Li

    (Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada)

  • Alison M. Hoens

    (Patient-research partner
    Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada)

  • Marie-Dominique Poirier

    (Patient-research partner)

  • France Légaré

    (VITAM Research Center for Sustainable Health, Quebec Integrated University Health and Social Services Center (CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale), QC, Canada
    Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Faculty of Medicine, QC, Canada
    Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada)

  • Simon Décary

    (School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada)

Abstract

Background (1) To estimate the prevalence of decision regret in chronic pain care, and (2) to identify factors associated with decision regret. Design We conducted a pan-Canadian cross-sectional online survey and reported the results following the Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies guidelines. We recruited a sample of adults experiencing chronic noncancer pain. We used a stratified proportional random sampling based on the population and chronic pain prevalence of each province. We measured decision regret with the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) and decisional needs with the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. We performed descriptive analysis to estimate the prevalence and level of decision regret and multilevel multivariable regression analysis to identify factors associated with regret according to the STRengthening Analytical Thinking for Observational Studies recommendations. Results We surveyed 1,649 people living with chronic pain, and 1,373 reported a most difficult decision from the 10 prespecified ones, enabling the collection of a DRS score. On a scale ranging from 0 to 100 where 1 reflects the presence of decision regret and 25 constitutes important decision regret, the mean DRS score in our sample was 28.8 ( s  = 19.6). Eighty-four percent of respondents experienced some decision regret and 50% at an important level. We identified 15 factors associated with decision regret, including 4 personal and 9 decision-making characteristics, and 2 consequences of the chosen option. Respondents with low education level and higher decisional conflict experienced more decision regret when the decision was deemed difficult. Conclusions This pan-Canadian survey highlighted a high prevalence and level of decision regret associated with difficult decisions for pain care. Decision making in pain care could be enhanced by addressing factors that contribute to decision regret. Highlights We conducted an online pan-Canadian survey and collected responses from a wide diversity of people living with chronic pain. More than 84% of respondents experienced decision regret and approximately 50% at an important level. We identified 15 factors associated with decision regret, including 4 personal and 9 decision-making characteristics, and 2 consequences of the chosen option. Our pan-Canadian survey reveals an urgent need of a shared decision-making approach in chronic pain care that can be potentiated by targeting multiple factors associated with decision regret.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Naye & Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme & Maxime Sasseville & Chloé Cachinho & Thomas Gérard & Karine Toupin-April & Olivia Dubois & Jean-Sébastien Paquette & Annie LeBlanc & Isabelle Gaboury & , 2025. "People Living with Chronic Pain Experience a High Prevalence of Decision Regret in Canada: A Pan-Canadian Online Survey," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 45(4), pages 462-479, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:45:y:2025:i:4:p:462-479
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X251326069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X251326069
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X251326069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:45:y:2025:i:4:p:462-479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.