IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v42y2022i4p474-486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Value-of-Information Framework for Personalizing the Timing of Surveillance Testing

Author

Listed:
  • Aasthaa Bansal

    (The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA)

  • Patrick J. Heagerty

    (Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA)

  • Lurdes Y. T. Inoue

    (Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA)

  • David L. Veenstra

    (The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA)

  • Charles J. Wolock

    (Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA)

  • Anirban Basu

    (The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA)

Abstract

Background Patient surveillance using repeated biomarker measurements presents an opportunity to detect and treat disease progression early. Frequent surveillance testing using biomarkers is recommended and routinely conducted in several diseases, including cancer and diabetes. However, frequent testing involves tradeoffs. Although surveillance tests provide information about current disease status, the complications and costs of frequent tests may not be justified for patients who are at low risk of progression. Predictions based on patients’ earlier biomarker values may be used to inform decision making; however, predictions are uncertain, leading to decision uncertainty. Methods We propose the Personalized Risk-Adaptive Surveillance (PRAISE) framework, a novel method for embedding predictions into a value-of-information (VOI) framework to account for the cost of uncertainty over time and determine the time point at which collection of biomarker data would be most valuable. The proposed sequential decision-making framework is innovative in that it leverages the patient’s longitudinal history, considers individual benefits and harms, and allows for dynamic tailoring of surveillance intervals by considering the uncertainty in current information and estimating the probability that new information may change treatment decisions, as well as the impact of this change on patient outcomes. Results When applied to data from cystic fibrosis patients, PRAISE lowers costs by allowing some patients to skip a visit, compared to an “always test†strategy. It does so without compromising expected survival, by recommending less frequent testing among those who are unlikely to be treated at the skipped time point. Conclusions A VOI-based approach to patient monitoring is feasible and could be applied to several diseases to develop more cost-effective and personalized strategies for ongoing patient care. Highlights In many patient-monitoring settings, the complications and costs of frequent tests are not justified for patients who are at low risk of disease progression. Predictions based on patient history may be used to individualize the timing of patient visits based on evolving risk. We propose Personalized Risk-Adaptive Surveillance (PRAISE), a novel method for personalizing the timing of surveillance testing, where prediction modeling projects the disease trajectory and a value-of-information (VOI)–based pragmatic decision-theoretic framework quantifies patient- and time-specific benefit-harm tradeoffs. A VOI-based approach to patient monitoring could be applied to several diseases to develop more personalized and cost-effective strategies for ongoing patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Aasthaa Bansal & Patrick J. Heagerty & Lurdes Y. T. Inoue & David L. Veenstra & Charles J. Wolock & Anirban Basu, 2022. "A Value-of-Information Framework for Personalizing the Timing of Surveillance Testing," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 42(4), pages 474-486, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:42:y:2022:i:4:p:474-486
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X211049213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X211049213
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X211049213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:42:y:2022:i:4:p:474-486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.