IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v40y2020i6p785-796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Enhanced Data Visualization to Improve Patient Judgments about Hypertension Control

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria A. Shaffer

    (Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA)

  • Pete Wegier

    (Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada)

  • K. D. Valentine

    (Health Decision Sciences Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA)

  • Jeffery L. Belden

    (Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA)

  • Shannon M. Canfield

    (Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA)

  • Mihail Popescu

    (Department of Health Management and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA)

  • Linsey M. Steege

    (School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA)

  • Akshay Jain

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA)

  • Richelle J. Koopman

    (Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA)

Abstract

Objective . Uncontrolled hypertension is driven by clinical uncertainty around blood pressure data. This research sought to determine whether decision support—in the form of enhanced data visualization—could improve judgments about hypertension control. Methods . Participants (Internet sample of patients with hypertension) in 3 studies ( N = 209) viewed graphs depicting blood pressure data for fictitious patients. For each graph, participants rated hypertension control, need for medication change, and perceived risk of heart attack and stroke. In study 3, participants also recalled the percentage of blood pressure measurements outside of the goal range. The graphs varied by systolic blood pressure mean and standard deviation, change in blood pressure values over time, and data visualization type. Results . In all 3 studies, data visualization type significantly affected judgments of hypertension control. In studies 1 and 2, perceived hypertension control was lower while perceived need for medication change and subjective perceptions of stroke and heart attack risk were higher for raw data displays compared with enhanced visualization that employed a smoothing function generated by the locally weighted smoothing algorithm. In general, perceptions of hypertension control were more closely aligned with clinical guidelines when data visualization included a smoothing function. However, conclusions were mixed when comparing tabular presentations of data to graphical presentations of data in study 3. Hypertension was perceived to be less well controlled when data were presented in a graph rather than a table, but recall was more accurate. Conclusion . Enhancing data visualization with the use of a smoothing function to minimize the variability present in raw blood pressure data significantly improved judgments about hypertension control. More research is needed to determine the contexts in which graphs are superior to data tables.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria A. Shaffer & Pete Wegier & K. D. Valentine & Jeffery L. Belden & Shannon M. Canfield & Mihail Popescu & Linsey M. Steege & Akshay Jain & Richelle J. Koopman, 2020. "Use of Enhanced Data Visualization to Improve Patient Judgments about Hypertension Control," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 40(6), pages 785-796, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:40:y:2020:i:6:p:785-796
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X20940999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X20940999
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X20940999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:40:y:2020:i:6:p:785-796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.