IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v40y2020i1p81-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing a Preeclampsia Prediction Model in Obstetrics: Cutoff Determination and Health Care Professionals’ Adherence

Author

Listed:
  • Pim van Montfort

    (Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, the Netherlands)

  • Luc J. M. Smits

    (Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, the Netherlands)

  • Ivo M. A. van Dooren

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Jans Gasthuis Weert, Weert, Limburg, the Netherlands)

  • Stéphanie M. P. Lemmens

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, the Netherlands)

  • Maartje Zelis

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, Limburg, the Netherlands)

  • Iris M. Zwaan

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, Limburg, the Netherlands)

  • Marc E. A. Spaanderman

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, the Netherlands)

  • Hubertina C. J. Scheepers

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, the Netherlands)

Abstract

Background . Despite improved management, preeclampsia remains an important cause of maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. Low-dose aspirin (LDA) lowers the risk of preeclampsia. Although several guidelines recommend LDA prophylaxis in women at increased risk, they disagree about the definition of high risk. Recently, an externally validated prediction model for preeclampsia was implemented in a Dutch region combined with risk-based obstetric care paths. Objectives . To demonstrate the selection of a risk threshold and to evaluate the adherence of obstetric health care professionals to the prediction tool. Study Design . Using a survey ( n = 136) and structured meetings among health care professionals, possible cutoff values at which LDA should be discussed were proposed. The prediction model, with chosen cutoff and corresponding risk-based care paths, was embedded in an online tool. Subsequently, a prospective multicenter cohort study ( n = 850) was performed to analyze the adherence of health care professionals. Patient questionnaires, linked to the individual risk profiles calculated by the online tool, were used to evaluate adherence. Results . Health care professionals agreed upon employing a tool with a high detection rate (cutoff: 3.0%; sensitivity 75%, specificity 64%) followed by shared decision between patients and health care professionals on LDA prophylaxis. Of the 850 enrolled women, 364 women had an increased risk of preeclampsia. LDA was discussed with 273 of these women, resulting in an 81% adherence rate. Conclusion . Consensus regarding a suitable risk cutoff threshold was reached. The adherence to this recommendation was 81%, indicating adequate implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Pim van Montfort & Luc J. M. Smits & Ivo M. A. van Dooren & Stéphanie M. P. Lemmens & Maartje Zelis & Iris M. Zwaan & Marc E. A. Spaanderman & Hubertina C. J. Scheepers, 2020. "Implementing a Preeclampsia Prediction Model in Obstetrics: Cutoff Determination and Health Care Professionals’ Adherence," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 40(1), pages 81-89, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:40:y:2020:i:1:p:81-89
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X19889890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X19889890
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X19889890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:40:y:2020:i:1:p:81-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.