IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v37y2017i8p914-921.html

Acceptability of In Utero Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan M. Antiel
  • Scott D. Halpern
  • Evelyn M. Stevens
  • Jesse D. Vrecenak
  • Chavis A. Patterson
  • Trudy Tchume-Johnson
  • Kim Smith-Whitley
  • William H. Peranteau
  • Alan W. Flake
  • Lamia P. Barakat

Abstract

Background . In utero hematopoietic cell transplantation (IUHCT) has curative potential for sickle cell disease (SCD) but carries a risk of fetal demise. Methods . We assessed the conditions under which parents of children with SCD and young adults with SCD would consider IUHCT in a future pregnancy, given a 5% fixed risk of fetal demise. Participants were randomized to consider a hypothetical cure rate (20%, 40%, or 70%). Subsequently, cure rate was either increased or decreased depending on the previous answer to reveal the lowest acceptable rate. Participants also completed the Pediatric Research Participation Questionnaire (PRPQ) and an omission scale. Results . Overall, 74 of 79 (94%) participants were willing to consider IUHCT, and 52 (66%) participants accepted IUHCT at a cure rate of 40%, the estimated rate of therapeutic mixed chimerism. Participants with higher scores on the PRPQ perceived benefits scale were more likely to participate at lower cure rates (OR 1.08, p=0.007) and participants with a greater degree of omission bias were less likely to participate at lower cure rates (OR 0.83, p=0.04). Demographics and SCD severity were not significantly associated with acceptability of IUHCT. Conclusion . This study suggests that the majority of parents >and young adults would consider IUHCT under expected therapeutic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan M. Antiel & Scott D. Halpern & Evelyn M. Stevens & Jesse D. Vrecenak & Chavis A. Patterson & Trudy Tchume-Johnson & Kim Smith-Whitley & William H. Peranteau & Alan W. Flake & Lamia P. Barakat, 2017. "Acceptability of In Utero Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 37(8), pages 914-921, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:37:y:2017:i:8:p:914-921
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17707214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X17707214
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X17707214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rebecca Hess & Vivianne H. M. Visschers & Michael Siegrist, 2011. "Risk communication with pictographs: The role of numeracy and graph processing," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 6(3), pages 263-274, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carmen Keller & Christina Kreuzmair & Rebecca Leins-Hess & Michael Siegrist, 2014. "Numeric and graphic risk information processing of high and low numerates in the intuitive and deliberative decision modes: An eye-tracker study," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 9(5), pages 420-432, September.
    2. Marielle Brunette, 2012. "Do risk communication methods perform to generate rationality?," Working Papers - Cahiers du LEF 2012-01, Laboratoire d'Economie Forestiere, AgroParisTech-INRA.
    3. Cornelia Betsch & Niels Haase & Frank Renkewitz & Philipp Schmid, 2015. "The narrative bias revisited: What drives the biasing influence of narrative information on risk perceptions?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(3), pages 241-264, May.
    4. Stacie A. Bosley & Reece Thomas & George Matthew Maroney & Joseph Penders & Samantha Snyder & Sarah Greenman, 2025. "Profit-and-Loss Disclaimers and Disclosures: Testing a Regulatory Framework for Multi-level Marketing," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 133-164, June.
    5. Floris Goerlandt & Jie Li & Genserik Reniers, 2020. "The Landscape of Risk Communication Research: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-31, May.
    6. Christina Kreuzmair & Michael Siegrist & Carmen Keller, 2017. "Does Iconicity in Pictographs Matter? The Influence of Iconicity and Numeracy on Information Processing, Decision Making, and Liking in an Eye‐Tracking Study," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 546-556, March.
    7. Yasmina Okan & Eva Janssen & Mirta Galesic & Erika A. Waters, 2019. "Using the Short Graph Literacy Scale to Predict Precursors of Health Behavior Change," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 39(3), pages 183-195, April.
    8. Christina Kreuzmair & Michael Siegrist & Carmen Keller, 2016. "High Numerates Count Icons and Low Numerates Process Large Areas in Pictographs: Results of an Eye‐Tracking Study," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(8), pages 1599-1614, August.
    9. Ilan Fischer & Shacked Avrashi & Lior Givon, 2024. "Subjective game structures: eliciting alternatives and payoffs to study the properties of social interactions," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 27(4), pages 922-944, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:37:y:2017:i:8:p:914-921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.