Author
Listed:
- Elbert S. Huang
- Aviva G. Nathan
- Jennifer M. Cooper
- Sang Mee Lee
- Na Shin
- Priya M. John
- William Dale
- Nananda F. Col
- David O. Meltzer
- Marshall H. Chin
Abstract
Background. Diabetes guidelines recommend individualizing glycemic goals (A1C) for older patients. The aim of this study was to assess a personalized Web-based decision support tool. Methods. We randomized physicians and their patients with type 2 diabetes (≥65 years of age) to a support tool or educational pamphlet (75:25 patients). Prior to a visit, intervention patients interacted with the tool, which provided personalized risk predictions and elicited treatment preferences. Main outcomes included 1) patient-doctor communication, 2) decisional conflict, 3) changes in goals, and 4) intervention acceptability. Results. We did not find significant differences in proportions of patients who had an A1C discussion (91% intervention v. 76% control; P = 0.19). Intervention patients had larger declines in the informed subscale of decisional conflict (–20 v. 0, respectively; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in proportions of patients with changes in goals (49% v. 28%, respectively; P = 0.08). Most intervention patients reported that the tool was easy to use (91%) and helped them to communicate (84%). A limitation was that this was a pilot trial at one academic institution. Conclusions. Web-based decision support tools may be a practical approach to facilitating the personalization of goals for chronic conditions. Trial registration: NCT02169999 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02169999 ).
Suggested Citation
Elbert S. Huang & Aviva G. Nathan & Jennifer M. Cooper & Sang Mee Lee & Na Shin & Priya M. John & William Dale & Nananda F. Col & David O. Meltzer & Marshall H. Chin, 2017.
"Impact and Feasibility of Personalized Decision Support for Older Patients with Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Trial,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 37(5), pages 611-617, July.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:37:y:2017:i:5:p:611-617
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X16654142
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:37:y:2017:i:5:p:611-617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.