IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v37y2017i5p534-543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The n-by-T Target Discharge Strategy for Inpatient Units

Author

Listed:
  • Pratik J. Parikh
  • Nicholas Ballester
  • Kylie Ramsey
  • Nan Kong
  • Nancy Pook

Abstract

Background. Ineffective inpatient discharge planning often causes discharge delays and upstream boarding. While an optimal discharge strategy that works across all units at a hospital is likely difficult to identify and implement, a strategy that provides a reasonable target to the discharge team appears feasible. Methods. We used observational and retrospective data from an inpatient trauma unit at a Level 2 trauma center in the Midwest US. Our proposed novel n-by-T strategy—discharge n patients by the Tth hour—was evaluated using a validated simulation model. Outcome measures included 2 measures: time-based (mean discharge completion and upstream boarding times) and capacity-based (increase in annual inpatient and upstream bed hours). Data from the pilot implementation of a 2-by-12 strategy at the unit was obtained and analyzed. Results. The model suggested that the 1-by-T and 2-by-T strategies could advance the mean completion times by over 1.38 and 2.72 h, respectively (for 10 AM ≤ T ≤ noon, occupancy rate = 85%); the corresponding mean boarding time reductions were nearly 11% and 15%. These strategies could increase the availability of annual inpatient and upstream bed hours by at least 2,469 and 500, respectively. At 100% occupancy rate, the hospital-favored 2-by-12 strategy reduced the mean boarding time by 26.1%. A pilot implementation of the 2-by-12 strategy at the unit corroborated with the model findings: a 1.98-h advancement in completion times (P

Suggested Citation

  • Pratik J. Parikh & Nicholas Ballester & Kylie Ramsey & Nan Kong & Nancy Pook, 2017. "The n-by-T Target Discharge Strategy for Inpatient Units," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 37(5), pages 534-543, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:37:y:2017:i:5:p:534-543
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17691735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X17691735
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X17691735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:37:y:2017:i:5:p:534-543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.