IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v33y2013i2p271-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Don’t Know†Responses to Risk Perception Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Erika A. Waters
  • Jennifer L. Hay
  • Heather Orom
  • Marc T. Kiviniemi
  • Bettina F. Drake

Abstract

Background: Risk perceptions are legitimate targets for behavioral interventions because they can motivate medical decisions and health behaviors. However, some survey respondents may not know (or may not indicate) their risk perceptions. The scope of “don’t know†(DK) responding is unknown. Objective: Examine the prevalence and correlates of responding DK to items assessing perceived risk of colorectal cancer. Methods: Two nationally representative, population-based, cross-sectional surveys (2005 National Health Interview Survey [NHIS]; 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]), and one primary care clinic-based survey comprised of individuals from low-income communities. Analyses included 31,202 (NHIS), 1,937 (HINTS), and 769 (clinic) individuals. Measures: Five items assessed perceived risk of colorectal cancer. Four of the items differed in format and/or response scale: comparative risk (NHIS, HINTS); absolute risk (HINTS, clinic), and “likelihood†and “chance†response scales (clinic). Only the clinic-based survey included an explicit DK response option. Results: “Don’t know†responding was 6.9% (NHIS), 7.5% (HINTS-comparative), and 8.7% (HINTS-absolute). “Don’t know†responding was 49.1% and 69.3% for the “chance†and “likely†response options (clinic). Correlates of DK responding were characteristics generally associated with disparities (e.g., low education), but the pattern of results varied among samples, question formats, and response scales. Limitations: The surveys were developed independently and employed different methodologies and items. Consequently, the results were not directly comparable. There may be multiple explanations for differences in the magnitude and characteristics of DK responding. Conclusions: “Don’t know†responding is more prevalent in populations affected by health disparities. Either not assessing or not analyzing DK responses could further disenfranchise these populations and negatively affect the validity of research and the efficacy of interventions seeking to eliminate health disparities.

Suggested Citation

  • Erika A. Waters & Jennifer L. Hay & Heather Orom & Marc T. Kiviniemi & Bettina F. Drake, 2013. "“Don’t Know†Responses to Risk Perception Measures," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(2), pages 271-281, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:33:y:2013:i:2:p:271-281
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X12464435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X12464435
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X12464435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:33:y:2013:i:2:p:271-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.