IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v33y2013i1p85-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating Patient Decision Aids into Standard Clinical Practice in an Integrated Delivery System

Author

Listed:
  • Clarissa Hsu
  • David T. Liss
  • Emily O. Westbrook
  • David Arterburn

Abstract

Background . Randomized controlled trials show that patient decision aids (DAs) can promote shared decision making and improve decision quality. Despite this evidence, integration of DAs into routine clinical practice has proceeded slowly. Objective . To identify factors that promote or impede integrating DAs into clinical practice in a large health care delivery system. Design . Mixed-methods case study. Setting and Patients . Group Health, an integrated health plan and care delivery system in Washington state. Intervention . The project was carried out in 6 specialty service lines using 12 video-based DAs for preference-sensitive conditions related to elective surgical procedures. Measurements . Process data, site visits, meeting observations, and in-depth interviews conducted with clinical staff, project staff, and health plan leaders in 2009 and 2010. Results . The project established systemwide and clinic-specific processes that facilitated the distribution of approximately 10,000 DAs over 2 years. Several factors were identified as important for success in this implementation, including strong support from senior leaders, establishing a system for previsit ordering and providing timely feedback to teams about distribution rates, engaging providers and staff in development of the implementation process, and finding ways to address concerns about conditions that were perceived as life-threatening and/or time sensitive. Limitations . Limitations included lack of data on patient perspectives, an implementation setting with salaried providers, and frontline provider interviews conducted in only selected service lines. Conclusions . With strong leadership, financial support, and a well-defined implementation strategy, 12 video-based DAs in 6 specialty service lines were integrated into routine practice over 2 years. Findings from this demonstration may advance the ability of other organizations to use DAs effectively and promote widespread adoption of shared decision making in routine patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Clarissa Hsu & David T. Liss & Emily O. Westbrook & David Arterburn, 2013. "Incorporating Patient Decision Aids into Standard Clinical Practice in an Integrated Delivery System," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(1), pages 85-97, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:33:y:2013:i:1:p:85-97
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X12468615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X12468615
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X12468615?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalie Joseph-Williams & Purva Abhyankar & Laura Boland & Paulina Bravo & Alison T. Brenner & Suzanne Brodney & Angela Coulter & Anik Giguère & Aubri Hoffman & Mirjam Körner & Aisha Langford & Fran, 2021. "What Works in Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Routine Clinical Settings? A Rapid Realist Review and Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(7), pages 907-937, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:33:y:2013:i:1:p:85-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.