IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v32y2012i2p311-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerable Patients’ Perceptions of Health Care Quality and Quality Data

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Catherine Raven
  • Colleen C. Gillespie
  • Rebecca DiBennardo
  • Kristin Van Busum
  • Brian Elbel

Abstract

Background. Little is known about how patients served by safety-net hospitals utilize and respond to hospital quality data. Objective. To understand how vulnerable, lower income patients make health care decisions and define quality of care and whether hospital quality data factor into such decisions and definitions. Methods. Mixed quantitative and qualitative methods were used to gather primary data from patients at an urban, tertiary-care safety-net hospital. The study hospital is a member of the first public hospital system to voluntarily post hospital quality data online for public access. Patients were recruited from outpatient and inpatient clinics. Surveys were used to collect data on participants’ sociodemographic characteristics, health literacy, health care experiences, and satisfaction variables. Focus groups were used to explore a representative sample of 24 patients’ health care decision making and views of quality. Data from focus group transcripts were iteratively coded and analyzed by the authors. Results. Focus group participants were similar to the broader diverse, low-income clinic population. Participants reported exercising choice in making decisions about where to seek health care. Multiple sources influenced decision-making processes including participants’ own beliefs and values, social influences, and prior experiences. Hospital quality data were notably absent as a source of influence in health care decision making for this population largely because participants were unaware of its existence. Participants’ views of hospital quality were influenced by the quality and efficiency of services provided (with an emphasis on the doctor-patient relationship) and patient centeredness. When presented with it, patients appreciated the hospital quality data and, with guidance, were interested in incorporating it into health care decision making. Conclusions. Results suggest directions for optimizing the presentation, content, and availability of hospital quality data. Future research will explore how similar populations form and make choices based on presentation of hospital quality data.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Catherine Raven & Colleen C. Gillespie & Rebecca DiBennardo & Kristin Van Busum & Brian Elbel, 2012. "Vulnerable Patients’ Perceptions of Health Care Quality and Quality Data," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(2), pages 311-326, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:32:y:2012:i:2:p:311-326
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X11421414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X11421414
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X11421414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Margot Jager & Janine de Zeeuw & Janne Tullius & Roberta Papa & Cinzia Giammarchi & Amanda Whittal & Andrea F. de Winter, 2019. "Patient Perspectives to Inform a Health Literacy Educational Program: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:32:y:2012:i:2:p:311-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.