IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v27y2007i4p423-437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Concordance with Guideline Triage Recommendations Affect Clinical Care of Patients with Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome?

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Katz

    (Department of Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, david-katz@uiowa.edu)

  • Jeffrey Dawson

    (Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa)

  • Joni R. Beshansky

    (Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts)

  • Peter S. Rahko

    (Division of Cardiology)

  • Tom P. Aufderheide

    (Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee)

  • Mark Bogner

    (Section of Emergency Medicine at the University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Hocine Tighouart

    (Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts)

  • Harry P. Selker

    (Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts)

Abstract

Background. The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) Unstable Angina Practice Guideline recommends outpatient management for patients at low risk and admission to a monitored bed for patients at intermediate-high risk of adverse short-term outcomes, but the clinical consequences of adhering to these recommendations are unclear. Methods. This analysis included 7466 adults who presented to the emergency department (ED) with symptoms of possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and who participated in 3 prospective clinical effectiveness trials during the period 1993 to 2001. The authors used logistic regression to assess the impact of concordance with guideline triage recommendations on subsequent diagnostic testing, follow-up care, and 30-day mortality and applied propensity score methods to adjust for selection bias. Results. Among low-risk patients (n = 1099), ED discharge was not associated with higher mortality and did not increase the need for emergency care or hospitalization during follow-up (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63—1.6 for ED revisits); however, 1.7% of discharged low-risk patients had confirmed ACS. Among intermediate- to high-risk patients (n = 6367), admission to a monitored bed was not associated with reduction in 30-day mortality but significantly reduced the need for follow-up ED care (adjusted OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.69—0.96). Conclusions. This analysis supports the practice of discharging low-risk ED patients with symptoms of possible ACS but highlights the need to arrange timely follow-up (or to perform additional risk stratification in the ED prior to discharge). It also confirms the benefit of admitting ED patients with intermediate- to high-risk characteristics to a monitored bed.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Katz & Jeffrey Dawson & Joni R. Beshansky & Peter S. Rahko & Tom P. Aufderheide & Mark Bogner & Hocine Tighouart & Harry P. Selker, 2007. "Does Concordance with Guideline Triage Recommendations Affect Clinical Care of Patients with Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 27(4), pages 423-437, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:27:y:2007:i:4:p:423-437
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07302557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X07302557
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X07302557?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:27:y:2007:i:4:p:423-437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.