IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v26y2006i6p599-605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physician Practice Patterns: Chest X-Ray Ordering for the Evaluation of Acute Cough Illness in Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Aagaard

    (400 Parnassus Ave., Box 0320, San Francisco, CA 94143)

  • Judy Maselli
  • Ralph Gonzales

Abstract

Objectives . The authors examine which clinical factors contribute to the clinician suspicion of pneumonia, as well as the relationship between clinical factors, clinician suspicion of pneumonia, and ordering chest X-rays (CXR). Methods . Three hundred consecutive adults presenting to the clinic with acute cough in the winter of 2003 were studied. Using standardized encounter forms, data were collected on sociodemographics, illness impact, symptoms, tobacco use, past medical history, vital signs, physical examination findings, chest X-ray result, and clinician diagnoses. Clinicians rated their suspicion of pneumonia on a 5-point Likert scale. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of clinician suspicion of pneumonia and of ordering of CXRs. Results . Clinician suspicion of pneumonia was low in the majority of patients presenting for evaluation of cough (63%). Higher clinician suspicion of pneumonia was predicted by advanced patient age (odds ratio [OR]: 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.2–18.1]), shortness of breath (2.4; [1.0–6.0]), fever (5.5; [1.8–17.5]), tachycardia (3.8; [1.1–13.1]), rales (23.8; [5.7–98.7]), and rhonchi (14.6; [5.2–40.5]). CXRs were ordered in 19% of patients presenting with acute cough. Intermediate clinician suspicion of pneumonia (OR: 7.9; 95% CI: [2.8, 22.5]) (v. low suspicion), advanced patient age ([.greaterequal] 65 years) (9.2; [2.7, 31.6]) (v. ages 18–44 years), and decreased breath sounds on examination (5.1; [1.8, 14.3]) are independent predictors of ordering a CXR. Among patients with a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia (n = 31), CXRs were ordered in only 61%. Conclusions . Advanced patient age and physical findings on chest examination influence clinician practice in obtaining CXRs, beyond their contribution to clinician suspicion of pneumonia. Physicians do not appear to endorse recommendations that the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia be based on or confirmed by CXR.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Aagaard & Judy Maselli & Ralph Gonzales, 2006. "Physician Practice Patterns: Chest X-Ray Ordering for the Evaluation of Acute Cough Illness in Adults," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(6), pages 599-605, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:26:y:2006:i:6:p:599-605
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06295357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X06295357
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X06295357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:26:y:2006:i:6:p:599-605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.