Author
Listed:
- Peter C. Austin
(Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto)
Abstract
Purpose . Hospital report cards are commonly produced using administrative data. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of unmeasured clinical data on the accuracy of hospitals’ report cards. Methods . Monte Carlo simulations were based on both administrative and detailed clinical data for patients hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction in Ontario, Canada. Data were simulated such that the true performance of each hospital was known. Both clinical and administrative risk scores were randomly generated for each patient. The ability of hospital report cards to correctly identify hospitals that truly had higher than acceptable mortality was compared when both clinical and administrative data were used and when only administrative data were used. By using Monte Carlo simulations, we were able to incrementally increase the divergence between the 2 risk scores. Results . In a wide range of settings, sensitivity and specificity of hospital report cards was only negligibly greater when both administrative and clinical data were used compared to when only administrative data were used. Conclusions . Unmeasured clinical data have at most a minor impact on the accuracy of cardiac hospital report cards.
Suggested Citation
Peter C. Austin, 2006.
"The Impact of Unmeasured Clinical Variables on the Accuracy of Hospital Report Cards: A Monte Carlo Study,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(5), pages 447-466, September.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:26:y:2006:i:5:p:447-466
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06290498
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:26:y:2006:i:5:p:447-466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.