IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v24y2004i6p654-658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Uncertainty in Medical Testing

Author

Listed:
  • Robert L. Winkler

    (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina)

  • James E. Smith

    (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina)

Abstract

There is confusion in the medical decision-making literature about how to handle uncertainty in medical tests. In this article, the authors consider the situation in which there is uncertainty about the pretest probability of a disease in a patient as well as uncertainty about the sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test for that disease. They discuss how to calculate posttest probabilities of a disease under such uncertainty and how to calculate a distribution for a posttest probability. They show that given certain independence assumptions, uncertainty about these parameters need not complicate the calculation of patient positive predictive values: One can simply use the expected values of the parameters in the standard Bayesian formula for posttest probabilities. The discussion on how to calculate distributions for positive predictive values corrects a common and potentially important error.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert L. Winkler & James E. Smith, 2004. "On Uncertainty in Medical Testing," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 24(6), pages 654-658, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:24:y:2004:i:6:p:654-658
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X04271045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X04271045
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X04271045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:24:y:2004:i:6:p:654-658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.