IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v24y2004i2p131-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parametric Mean Survival Time Analysis in Gastric Cancer Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Shunzo Maetani
  • Toshifusa Nakajima
  • Toshikuni Nishikawa

Abstract

Background The mean survival time (MS) has acquired increasing importance as an outcome indicator for patient care and technology assessment. The authors use lifelong followup data from gastric cancer patients to study whether the MS is predictable from 5-year follow-up information based on 2 parametric models. Methods . The authors used 3597 gastric cancer patients operated on between 1950 and 1969 to create 50 groups. For each group, the disease-related survival curve (DRSC) was estimated from the 5-year follow-up data using the Boag model. The MS for the group was then estimated by combining the DRSC with the survival curve for the age and sex-matched contemporaries (control group) based on the competing risk model. Alternatively, it was estimated by using the DRSC and the MS for the control group (the survival limit model). These predicted MS values were compared with the full follow-up observations. Results . Although individual prediction errors varied depending on the group size (63 to 3597 patients) and the length of MS (0.3 to 20.2 years), the mean prediction errors were reasonably small; the survival limit model overestimated MS by 4.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 7.8) and the competing risk model by 3.2% (95% CI, 0.1 to 6.5). Conclusions . MS for gastric cancer patients is parametrically predictable from 5-year follow-up data. This analysis should be applicable to other diseases showing log-normal failure time distributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shunzo Maetani & Toshifusa Nakajima & Toshikuni Nishikawa, 2004. "Parametric Mean Survival Time Analysis in Gastric Cancer Patients," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 24(2), pages 131-141, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:24:y:2004:i:2:p:131-141
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X04263253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X04263253
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X04263253?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:24:y:2004:i:2:p:131-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.