IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v21y2001i5p368-375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Diagnostic Errors with Induced Decision Trees

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine K. Murphy

    (Penn State York, York, Pennsylvania)

Abstract

Objective. The purpose of this article is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of induced decision trees with that of pruned neural networks and to improve the accuracy and interpretation of breast cancer diagnosis from readings of thin-needle aspirate by identifying cases likely to be misclassified by induced decision rules. Method. Using an online database consisting of 699 cases of suspected breast cancer and their corresponding readings of fine-needle aspirate, decision trees were induced from half of the cases, randomly selected. Accuracy was determined for the remaining cases in successive partitions. The pattern of errors in the multiple decision trees was examined. A smaller data set was created with 2 classes: (1) correctly classified and (2) misclassified by a decision tree, rather than the original benign and malignant classes. From this data set, decision trees that describe the misclassified cases were induced. Results. Larger, less severely pruned decision trees were more accurate in breast cancer diagnosis for both training and test data. The accuracy of the induced decision trees exceeded that reported for the smaller pruned neural networks. Combining classifications from 2 trees was effective in identifying malignancies missed by a single tree. Induced decision trees were able to identify patterns associated with misclassified cases, but the identification of errors inductively did not improve the overall error rate. Conclusion. In this application, a model that is too compact identifies fewer cases of the minority class, malignancy. New methods that combine models and examine classification errors can improve diagnosis by identifying more malignancies and by describing ambiguous cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine K. Murphy, 2001. "Identifying Diagnostic Errors with Induced Decision Trees," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 21(5), pages 368-375, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:21:y:2001:i:5:p:368-375
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0102100503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0102100503
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X0102100503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davide Barbieri & Nitesh Chawla & Luciana Zaccagni & Tonći Grgurinović & Jelena Šarac & Miran Čoklo & Saša Missoni, 2020. "Predicting Cardiovascular Risk in Athletes: Resampling Improves Classification Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-9, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:21:y:2001:i:5:p:368-375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.