IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v19y1999i4p394-398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Patients' Preferences for Risk Information Influence Treatment Choice in a Case of High Risk and High Therapeutic Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Dennis J. Mazur
  • David H. Hickam
  • Marcus D. Mazur

Abstract

To assess how patients' preferences for non-numerical risk information are related to their tendency to choose early surgical treatment for asymptomatic gland-confined prostate cancer (a choice with high risk and high therapeutic uncertainty), the authors conducted a cross-sectional study of 228 patients receiving continuing care in a gen eral medicine clinic. After being provided with three data disclosures related to the treatment decision, subjects were given a choice between surgery-now and watchful waiting. Data about surgical complications were presented in numerical format. The subjects were also asked whether they preferred communication with their physician about the chance (probability) of adverse outcomes—related to management strate gies—in terms of words (such as possible or probable) or numbers (such as percent ages). Of the 226 patients who chose either surgery-now or watchful waiting, 71.2% preferred risk information in terms of words only or numbers only: 44% words only, and 56% numbers only. Younger patients (OR = 1.06 per year; Cl = 1.02-1.10, p = 0.0008) and those wanting risk communication in terms of words only (OR = 2.41; Cl = 1.24-4.70, p = 0.01) tended to prefer surgery-now over watchful waiting as the management strategy for asymptomatic gland-confined prostate carcinoma. The au thors conclude that there is a significant association between patients' preferences for risk communication with their physicians in terms of words only and a tendency to prefer early surgical intervention for prostate cancer when surgical risk data are pro vided numerically. Key words: informed consent; medical decision making; patient- physician communication; patient preference; prostate carcinoma; nsk. (Med Decis Making 1999;19:394-398)

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis J. Mazur & David H. Hickam & Marcus D. Mazur, 1999. "How Patients' Preferences for Risk Information Influence Treatment Choice in a Case of High Risk and High Therapeutic Uncertainty," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 19(4), pages 394-398, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:4:p:394-398
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9901900407
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9901900407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peder A. Halvorsen, 2010. "What Information Do Patients Need to Make a Medical Decision?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(5_suppl), pages 11-13, September.
    2. Vivianne H. M. Visschers & Ree M. Meertens & Wim W. F. Passchier & Nanne N. K. De Vries, 2009. "Probability Information in Risk Communication: A Review of the Research Literature," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 267-287, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:4:p:394-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.