IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v19y1999i3p296-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Screening Blood Donations for Hepatitis C in Central Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole Cancré
  • Frédéric Bois
  • Gérard Grésenguet
  • Catherine Fretz
  • Jean-Jacques Fournel
  • Laurent Bélec

Abstract

Four screening strategies (no testing, HC Abbott, HC Pasteur, and a combined test) for the detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody in donated blood were considered in a formal decision tree. Decision criteria included residual risk of infection and overall monetary cost. Tree parameters were determined using data from the Central African Republic. The prevalences observed among blood donors for HIV infection, hepatitis B, syphilis, and hepatitis C varied between 6% and 15%. The current residual risk of transfusion-transmitted infections is very high (8.4%). Screening for HCV would bring that risk down to about 3% with either the HC Pasteur, the HC Abbott, or the combined test. Even though baseline analysis gives preference to the HC Abbott test (the com bined test coming out last), Monte Carlo sensitivity and uncertainty analyses showed that Abbott's and Pasteur's tests are interchangeable, on the basis or either risk or cost considerations. Key words: Africa; blood donation; blood transfusion; decision tree analysis; hepatitis B virus; hepatitis C virus; human immunodeficiency virus; Monte Carlo; syphilis. (Med Decis Making 1999; 19:296-306)

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole Cancré & Frédéric Bois & Gérard Grésenguet & Catherine Fretz & Jean-Jacques Fournel & Laurent Bélec, 1999. "Screening Blood Donations for Hepatitis C in Central Africa," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 19(3), pages 296-306, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:3:p:296-306
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9901900308
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9901900308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:3:p:296-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.