IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v19y1999i3p221-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women's Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Woloshin
  • Lisa M. Schwartz
  • William C. Black
  • H. Gilbert Welch

Abstract

Background. Some studies suggest that women dramatically overestimate the risk of having breast cancer while others conclude that they underestimate it. To understand better how women perceive the chance of getting breast cancer, the authors asked women to estimate the risk in several ways. Each woman's answer was related to her actual risk. Methods. Women were randomly selected from a registry of female vet erans in New England. A mailed questionnaire asked each woman to estimate her ten-year risk of dying from breast cancer as a number out of 1,000 ("___ in 1,000" perceived risk) and whether this risk was higher than, the same as, or lower than that of an average woman her age (comparative perceived risk). The woman was also asked to compare her risk of dying from breast cancer with her risk of dying from heart disease. Risk-factor data were collected so that each woman's actual risk of breast cancer death could be estimated (actual risk). Results . 201 women had complete data. The median age of the respondents was 62 years (range 27-80), and 98% were high school graduates. Most women (98%) overestimated the "___ in 1,000" risk of breast cancer death—half by eightfold or more (Interquartile range, 4-36-fold overestimates). In contrast, only 10% of these women thought that they were at higher risk than an average woman their age. Most correctly thought that their risk of dying from breast cancer was lower than their risk of dying from heart disease. The women's "___ in 1,000" perceived risks of breast cancer death were unrelated to their actual risks and had no significant agreement with an external bench mark of importantly "high risk" (i.e., met risk criteria for the Tamoxifen primary pre vention trial). In contrast, the women's comparative perceptions of being at low, av erage or high risk were related to actual risks and significantly agreed with the "high risk" benchmark. Most women not at importantly "high risk" correctly classified them selves ; however, almost two thirds of "high risk" women misclassified themselves as "average or lower than average risk." Conclusions . The method used to elicit percep tions of risk matters. These women's responses to the comparative questions showed that they "knew more" about their actual risks than their open-ended numeric re sponses suggested. Key words: risk; perception; decision making; breast neoplasms. (Med Decis Making 1999;19:221-229)

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Woloshin & Lisa M. Schwartz & William C. Black & H. Gilbert Welch, 1999. "Women's Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risk," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 19(3), pages 221-229, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:3:p:221-229
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9901900301
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9901900301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:3:p:221-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.