IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v19y1999i1p38-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method for Evaluating Health Care Providers' Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • James G. Dolan

Abstract

Valid and reliable assessment of the clinical decision-making process is essential for the evaluation of decision aiding methods and effective quality assurance programs. The Provider Decision Process Assessment Instrument is a 12-item questionnaire that measures a health care provider's degree of comfort with a medical decision. Its mea surement properties were studied in two general internal medicine practices. Reliability, measured using Cronbach's alpha, was 0.90 (95% CI = 0.87 to 0.92). Construct validity was also high, with expected negative correlations ranging from -0.53 to -0.67. The instrument also satisfied standard criteria for item homogeneity and was readily com pleted by clinicians. These results suggest that the Provider Decision Process As sessment Instrument will prove to be a valuable tool for assessing medical decision making in busy clinical settings. Key words: decision making; decision support sys tems ; quality assessment. (Med Decis Making 1999;19:38-41)

Suggested Citation

  • James G. Dolan, 1999. "A Method for Evaluating Health Care Providers' Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 19(1), pages 38-41, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:1:p:38-41
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9901900105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9901900105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:1:p:38-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.