IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v17y1997i1p80-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of Computer-assisted Test Interpretation on Physician Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • David J. Brailer
  • Eugene Kroch
  • Mark V. Pauly

Abstract

This research investigated the effect of computer-assisted test interpretation (CATI) on physicians' readings of electrocardiograms (ECGs). The authors used an experimental method based on direct observations of 22 cardiologists, each reading 80 ECGs, for a total of 1,760 (of which 1,745 were used in the study). There were 40 sets of clini cally-matched pairs of ECGs, one with CATI and one without. Reading time was ob served and interpretation accuracy was measured by criterion-referenced aggregate scoring. To control for potential biases, the findings were subjected to multivariate analyses using ordinary least-squares regressions. The impact of CATI on cardiolo gists' readings of ECGs is demonstrably beneficial: the main empirical conclusion of this study is that, compared with conventional interpretation, the use of computer- assisted interpretation of ECGs cuts physician time by an average of 28% and signif icantly improves the concordance of the physician's interpretation with the expert benchmark, without increasing the false-positive rate. Moreover, CATI is the most ac curate and saves the most time when the ECGs have many unambiguous diagnoses. Given that computers alone cannot perform the task of cardiovascular diagnosis, and that cardiologists' ECG interpretations are greatly enhanced by ubiquitous CATI tech nology, it appears that the best approach is one that combines person and machine. Key words: electrocardiogram interpretation; computer-assisted test interpretation; physician decision making; diagnostic concordance; technology utilization. (Med Decis Making 1997;17:80-86)

Suggested Citation

  • David J. Brailer & Eugene Kroch & Mark V. Pauly, 1997. "The impact of Computer-assisted Test Interpretation on Physician Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(1), pages 80-86, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:17:y:1997:i:1:p:80-86
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9701700109
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9701700109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven D. Hillson & Donald P. Connelly & Yuanli Liu, 1995. "The Effects of Computer-assisted Electrocardiographic Interpretation on Physicians' Diagnostic Decisions," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 15(2), pages 107-112, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edward H. Shortliffe, 1995. "When Decision Support Doesn't Support," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 15(2), pages 187-188, June.
    2. William N. Southern & Julia Hope Arnsten, 2009. "The Effect of Erroneous Computer Interpretation of ECGs on Resident Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(3), pages 372-376, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:17:y:1997:i:1:p:80-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.