IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v11y1991i4p240-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eualuation of Nonlinear Optimization for Scheduling of follow-up cystoscopies to Detect Recurrent Bladder Cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel L. Kent
  • Robert A. Nease
  • Harold C. Sox JR
  • Linda D. Shortliffe
  • Ross Shachter

Abstract

Standard recommendations for patients who have had superficial bladder cancer are in spection by cystoscopy quarterly for a year or two after tumor removal, then half-yearly and yearly. The authors assessed the potential for improvement in scheduling cystoscopies according to probabilistic optimization techniques. Eight hypothetical practices were created, based on retrospective analysis of 918 bladder-cancer-patient charts. Standard and alter native recommendations for the interval to next cystoscopy were compared. The alternatives were derived from patient-specific predictions of future tumor risks (based on the patient's prior recurrence rate and tumor stage and grade) and a nonlinear optimization approach to allocation of the same number of cystoscopies as were available for standard follow-up. The optimization proposed longer intervals between visits for low-risk patients and shorter inter vals for high-risk patients. Overall, optimization reduced expected tumor detection delays by 30%, from 12.6 to 8.7 weeks. When optimization intervals were shorter than standard, cancer was found more often at subsequent cystoscopies (34% vs 27%, p

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel L. Kent & Robert A. Nease & Harold C. Sox JR & Linda D. Shortliffe & Ross Shachter, 1991. "Eualuation of Nonlinear Optimization for Scheduling of follow-up cystoscopies to Detect Recurrent Bladder Cancer," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 11(4), pages 240-248, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:11:y:1991:i:4:p:240-248
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9101100402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9101100402
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9101100402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:11:y:1991:i:4:p:240-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.