IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v40y2026i3p257-282.html

What do residents want from a North East Combined Authority transport policy? Evidence from conjoint experimental and adversarially co-produced narrative survey data

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Thew
  • David Littlefair
  • Graham Stark
  • Howard Reed
  • Matthew T. Johnson
  • Elliott A. Johnson

Abstract

This article presents findings from conjoint and adversarially co-produced narrative survey data from 577 adults within England’s North East Combined Authority collected in the run up to the first Mayoral election in 2024. This is the first instance of conjoint experimental analysis of priorities for regional transport policy. As might be expected, we found that cheaper, quicker, more reliable journeys were always preferred to slower, more expensive or less reliable journeys. This was true of journeys to London and those within the North East. Reduced deaths caused by air pollution, congestion and transport poverty significantly increased support for transport policies while greater congestion, increased car reliance and air pollution related deaths all reduce preference. Funding options such as council and income tax increases were negatively received, whereas taxes on corporations were comparatively favoured. Ownership and cycling rates were the least influential factors in shaping public preference toward transport policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Thew & David Littlefair & Graham Stark & Howard Reed & Matthew T. Johnson & Elliott A. Johnson, 2026. "What do residents want from a North East Combined Authority transport policy? Evidence from conjoint experimental and adversarially co-produced narrative survey data," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 40(3), pages 257-282, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:40:y:2026:i:3:p:257-282
    DOI: 10.1177/02690942261441415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02690942261441415
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/02690942261441415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:40:y:2026:i:3:p:257-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.