IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v39y2024i7-8p307-324.html

Working with technology: The case for worker-centered innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie Kelmenson
  • Nichola Lowe
  • Greg Schrock

Abstract

Manufacturing workers possess critical on-the-ground insights shaped by their daily engagement with production systems, technologies, and organizational routines. Yet in many small- and mid-sized manufacturing firms, these insights are underutilized, constrained by limited resources, rigid management structures, and a narrow focus on technical upskilling. This paper examines how publicly funded manufacturing support institutions can help address this disconnect by fostering worker-led innovation that integrates organizational, technological, and workforce change. Through a case study of the Oregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership (OMEP) and its partnership with a medium-sized manufacturer, World Class Technology Corporation, we analyze how MEP centers can serve as effective intermediaries in facilitating inclusive workplace innovation. OMEP’s approach involved aligning frontline worker participation with management goals and technological upgrades, enabling more collaborative and sustainable improvements. As domestic manufacturing faces renewed uncertainty under shifting political and economic conditions, this case underscores the value of MEP centers in strengthening the resilience of smaller firms. By recentering workers in innovation processes, MEPs not only improve firm competitiveness but also expand equitable participation in industrial transformation. This paper contributes to broader conversations about institutional strategies for advancing worker-centered innovation and proposes new directions for research and practice across the MEP network.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie Kelmenson & Nichola Lowe & Greg Schrock, 2024. "Working with technology: The case for worker-centered innovation," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 39(7-8), pages 307-324, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:39:y:2024:i:7-8:p:307-324
    DOI: 10.1177/02690942251359179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02690942251359179
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/02690942251359179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan Helper & Mari Sako, 2010. "Management innovation in supply chain: appreciating Chandler in the twenty-first century," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(2), pages 399-429, April.
    2. Beth A. Bechky, 2003. "Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 312-330, June.
    3. Tor Eriksson & Jaime Ortega, 2006. "The Adoption of Job Rotation: Testing the Theories," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 59(4), pages 653-666, July.
    4. Nichola Lowe & Greg Schrock & Matthew D. Wilson & Rumana Rabbani & Allison Forbes, 2023. "Centering Work: Integration and Diffusion of Workforce Development Within the U.S. Manufacturing Extension Network," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(4), pages 375-388, November.
    5. Paul Osterman & Thomas A. Kochan & Richard M. Locke & Michael J. Piore, 2002. "Working in America: A Blueprint for the New Labor Market," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262650622, December.
    6. Diane E. Bailey & Samer Faraj & Pamela J. Hinds & Paul M. Leonardi & Georg von Krogh, 2022. "We Are All Theorists of Technology Now: A Relational Perspective on Emerging Technology and Organizing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    2. Kertcher, Zack & Venkatraman, Rohan & Coslor, Erica, 2020. "Pleasingly parallel: Early cross-disciplinary work for innovation diffusion across boundaries in grid computing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 581-594.
    3. Beth A. Bechky, 2006. "Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21, February.
    4. Marco Tortoriello & Ray Reagans & Bill McEvily, 2012. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1024-1039, August.
    5. Cassiman, Bruno & Veugelers, Reinhilde & Arts, Sam, 2018. "Mind the gap: Capturing value from basic research through combining mobile inventors and partnerships," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1811-1824.
    6. Phanish Puranam & Harbir Singh & Saikat Chaudhuri, 2009. "Integrating Acquired Capabilities: When Structural Integration Is (Un)necessary," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 313-328, April.
    7. J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 2020. "Repeated Interaction in Teams: Tenure and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1496-1507, March.
    8. Nakamura, Eri & Sakai, Hiroki & Shoji, Kenichi, 2018. "Managerial transfers to reduce transaction costs among affiliated firms: Case study of Japanese railway holding companies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 102-110.
    9. Maggie Chuoyan Dong & Yulin Fang & Detmar W. Straub, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Distance on the Joint Performance of Collaborating Firms: The Role of Adaptive Interorganizational Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 309-331, June.
    10. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein & Karami, Amir & Conway, Patrick & Memariani, Ali & Lutz, Christoph, 2026. "Navigating the muddy waters of bias in artificial intelligence research: Understanding divergent meanings and conceptions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    11. Catherine Durnell Cramton & Tine Köhler & Raymond E. Levitt, 0. "Using scripts to address cultural and institutional challenges of global project coordination," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    12. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    13. Hannah Trittin-Ulbrich & Markus P. Zimmer & Stefanie Habersang & Leonhard Dobusch & Maren Gierlich-Joas & Elke Schüßler & Benjamin Mueller & Cristina Mihale-Wilson & Julia Zeller-Lanzl & Stephan Bohn , 2025. "Digital Responsibility: Building Bridges Between Organization Theory and Information Systems," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 597-642, December.
    14. Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Youngjin Yoo, 2007. "Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 631-647, August.
    15. D'Adderio, Luciana, 2008. "The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 769-789, June.
    16. Parjanen, Satu & Hyypiä, Mirva, 2019. "Innotin game supporting collective creativity in innovation activities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 26-34.
    17. Chen, Qin & Wang, Hongchuan & Ma, Chengcheng & Ru, Peng, 2025. "How professionals respond to disruptive effects of artificial intelligence on their jurisdiction: The role of interactive governance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 386(C).
    18. Manotti, Jacopo & Sanasi, Silvia & Ghezzi, Antonio, 2025. "Sustainable business model innovation: A technology affordance perspective in the New Space Economy," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    19. Constance E. Helfat & Miguel A. Campo-Rembado, 2016. "Integrative Capabilities, Vertical Integration, and Innovation Over Successive Technology Lifecycles," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 249-264, April.
    20. Elena Tavella & L. Alberto Franco, 2015. "Dynamics of Group Knowledge Production in Facilitated Modelling Workshops: An Exploratory Study," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 451-475, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:39:y:2024:i:7-8:p:307-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.