IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v39y2024i1-2p92-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sentiment and success potential of farmers’ producer organizations: A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Sayani Roy Chowdhury
  • Dona Ghosh
  • T Joji Rao

Abstract

Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs) are a viable alternative to cooperative farming, offering a commercialization model and improved income for smallholders. However, their adoption is often met with mixed sentiment among farmers, who lack capital, technical expertise, and institutional innovations. This study aims to explore the sentiments related to the adoption and success of FPOs in establishing a beneficial platform for small and marginal farmers, using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), sentiment and thematic analysis. The findings suggest that FPOs can enhance marketing strategies and agricultural productivity, but their impact on agriculture is case-sensitive. Cooperatives, characterized by member ownership and bottom-up development approaches, are essential factors in the context. A programmatic and comprehensive understanding of FPOs can help to develop a better agricultural and allied business ecosystem for diversified categories of farmers. Study aims to assess the sentiments and success potential of FPOs under an abundance of small and marginal farmers, comparing them to cooperative and contract farming legislation, to encourage a sustainable agribusiness ecosystem in India.

Suggested Citation

  • Sayani Roy Chowdhury & Dona Ghosh & T Joji Rao, 2024. "Sentiment and success potential of farmers’ producer organizations: A systematic literature review," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 39(1-2), pages 92-104, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:39:y:2024:i:1-2:p:92-104
    DOI: 10.1177/02690942241292724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02690942241292724
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/02690942241292724?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:39:y:2024:i:1-2:p:92-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.