IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v37y2022i7p622-638.html

Deals and devolution: The role of local authority deals in undermining devolved decision making

Author

Listed:
  • Janice Morphet

Abstract

The introduction of the devolved administrations (DAs) in the UK in 1999 was based on specific legal powers for this new scale of governance which included control of national and local priorities for expenditure within devolved matters. The legal powers conferred on these administrations included freedoms to determine expenditure within budgets which, in the case of DAs, included specific allocations linked to the Barnett Formula ensuring proportional allocations of UK state expenditure in a range of policy areas and later in the DAs, powers were provided to allow direct access to borrowing and raising funding through a range of means. In the period 1999–2014, DA powers were gradually increased, first in Scotland then in Wales and Northern Ireland. However, since 2014, in the DAs, UK Central Government has been using the provision of local and sub-regional ‘deal’ funding models, controlled by Whitehall, to gradually undermine this devolved decision making. This article discusses the role devolution and deals within the context of increasing EU principles of subsidiarity and the exercise of the UK Government’s de facto and de jure powers in response. It examines the role of deals in the DAs and their lack of accountability within the UK state.

Suggested Citation

  • Janice Morphet, 2022. "Deals and devolution: The role of local authority deals in undermining devolved decision making," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 37(7), pages 622-638, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:37:y:2022:i:7:p:622-638
    DOI: 10.1177/02690942231172170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02690942231172170
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/02690942231172170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eduardo Medeiros & Daniel Rauhut, 2020. "Territorial Cohesion Cities: a policy recipe for achieving Territorial Cohesion?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 120-128, January.
    2. Paul Craig, 2012. "Subsidiarity: A Political and Legal Analysis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(S1), pages 72-87, March.
    3. Mia Gray & Anna Barford, 2018. "The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(3), pages 541-563.
    4. David Beel & Martin Jones & Alex Plows, 2020. "Urban growth strategies in rural regions: building The North Wales Growth Deal," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(5), pages 719-731, May.
    5. Cecile regstdpy & Jean-Alain Heraud & Beth Perry, 2007. "Multi-level Governance, Regions and Science in France: Between Competition and Equality," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 1069-1084.
    6. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    7. O'Brien, Peter & Pike, Andy, 2015. "City deals, decentralisation and the governance of local infrastructure funding and financing in the UK," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 233, pages 14-26, August.
    8. Mark Sandford, 2016. "Public services and local government: the end of the principle of ‘funding following duties’," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 637-656, July.
    9. Alistair Bowden & Joyce Liddle, 2018. "Evolving public sector roles in the leadership of place-based partnerships: from controlling to influencing policy?," Post-Print hal-03513420, HAL.
    10. Andrew Scott & John Peterson & David Millar, 1994. "Subsidiarity: A ‘Europe of the Regions' v. the British Constitution?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 47-67, March.
    11. Alistair Bowden & Joyce Liddle, 2018. "Evolving public sector roles in the leadership of place-based partnerships: from controlling to influencing policy?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 145-155, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janice Morphet & John Denham, 2026. "Falling short? English Devolution Policy, OECD evidence and constitutional change," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 40(1), pages 48-64, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Teague, 1995. "'Europe of the Regions' and the Future of National Systems of Industrial Relations," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 16(3), pages 327-351, August.
    2. Kate Broadhurst & Jennifer Ferreira & Nigel Berkeley, 2021. "Collaborative leadership and place-based development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(2), pages 149-163, March.
    3. Kate Broadhurst & Edward Steane & Vlad Mykhnenko & Nicholas Gray, 2023. "Intergovernmental dynamics in responding to COVID-19 in English and Australian cities," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 185-196.
    4. Hulya Dagdeviren & Ewa Karwowski, 2022. "Corrigendum to: Impasse or mutation? Austerity and (de)financialisation of local governments in Britain," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 709-709.
    5. Janice Morphet & John Denham, 2023. "Trailblazer devolution deals: The next oxymoron in the policy litany of sub-national governance in England?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(8), pages 755-772, December.
    6. Bisani, Shalini & Daye, Marcella & Mortimer, Kathleen, 2024. "Legitimacy and inclusivity in place branding," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    8. Mark Partridge & M. Rose Olfert & Alessandro Alasia, 2007. "Canadian cities as regional engines of growth: agglomeration and amenities," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 39-68, February.
    9. João Juchem Neto & Julio Claeyssen, 2015. "Capital-induced labor migration in a spatial Solow model," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 25-47, May.
    10. Arcalean, Calin & Glomm, Gerhard & Schiopu, Ioana, 2012. "Growth effects of spatial redistribution policies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 988-1008.
    11. Marcel Bednarz & Tom Broekel, 2020. "Pulled or pushed? The spatial diffusion of wind energy between local demand and supply," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(4), pages 893-916.
    12. Joan R Rosés & Nikolaus Wolf, 2021. "Regional growth and inequality in the long-run: Europe, 1900–2015," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 37(1), pages 17-48.
    13. Emma Howard, 2017. "Social networks, geographic proximity, and firm performance in Vietnam," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-69, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Ingrid Ott & Susanne Soretz, 2006. "Governmental activity, integration, and agglomeration," Working Paper Series in Economics 57, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    15. Gao, Ting, 2004. "Regional industrial growth: evidence from Chinese industries," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 101-124, January.
    16. María Ayuda & Fernando Collantes & Vicente Pinilla, 2010. "From locational fundamentals to increasing returns: the spatial concentration of population in Spain, 1787–2000," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 25-50, March.
    17. Vasco Leite & Sofia Castro & João Correia-da-Silva, 2009. "The core periphery model with asymmetric inter-regional and intra-regional trade costs," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 8(1), pages 37-44, April.
    18. Sidney Turner & Richard Turner, 2011. "Capital cities: a special case in urban development," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 46(1), pages 19-35, February.
    19. Agarwalla, Astha, 2011. "Agglomeration Economies and Productivity Growth in India," IIMA Working Papers WP2011-01-08, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    20. Masashige Hamano & Pierre M. Picard, 2017. "Extensive and intensive margins and exchange rate regimes," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(3), pages 804-837, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:37:y:2022:i:7:p:622-638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.