IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v21y2006i3p279-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local-Authority led Economic Regeneration Strategies in the Aftermath of the Foot-and-Mouth Disease Crisis of 2001

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Taylor

    (Policy Studies and Services Management Group, Aston University, Birmingham, UK)

  • Mike Tricker

    (Policy Studies and Services Management Group, Aston University, Birmingham, UK)

Abstract

The Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) outbreak of 2001 in the UK was completely unprecedented in its scale and severity, with over four million animals culled and a cost to the Exchequer of over £4 billion. Local authorities were at the front line in dealing with the outbreak, in coordinating the cull of livestock, the disposal of carcasses as well as attempting to deal with its aftermath and, in particular, the impact on the wider rural economy. This article examines the impacts of this crisis on three local authorities, Devon, Herefordshire and Cumbria. It examines how far the crisis acted as a catalyst in developing strategies to deal with a future outbreak as well as new local initiatives to promote regeneration in the areas most adversely affected. It focuses on developments that can be directly attributed to the crisis and shows that FMD had a considerable impact on communications and ‘joined-up’ activity within local authorities and with local stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Taylor & Mike Tricker, 2006. "Local-Authority led Economic Regeneration Strategies in the Aftermath of the Foot-and-Mouth Disease Crisis of 2001," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(3), pages 279-291, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:21:y:2006:i:3:p:279-291
    DOI: 10.1080/02690940600808271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/02690940600808271
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02690940600808271?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:21:y:2006:i:3:p:279-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.