IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v16y2001i4p312-323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

RDAs, Sub-Regional Partnerships and Local Regeneration

Author

Listed:
  • Joyce Liddle

Abstract

This article examines the structures and relationships being formed between regional, sub-regional and local levels of governance. It highlights how traditional methods for the delivery of regeneration, based on Weberian formalization, centralization and bureaucratic procedures, are being challenged by the call for more flexible arrangements with decentralized decision-making and wider participation, a key philosophy of contemporary regeneration management. It is suggested that the implementation of programmes is problematic because cultural and professional differences emerge between professional regeneration managers an d the recipients of regeneration projects. By focusing on the emergence of four Sub-Regional Partnerships (SRPs), a new intermediary in regeneration, in the North East of England, this article will be of interest to both practitioners and academics. Early evidence tends to indicate that through SRPs, the governance of regeneration appears to be an other ‘managerial fix’ rather than a new form of political articulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Joyce Liddle, 2001. "RDAs, Sub-Regional Partnerships and Local Regeneration," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 16(4), pages 312-323, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:16:y:2001:i:4:p:312-323
    DOI: 10.1080/02690940110079859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/02690940110079859
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02690940110079859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Hazell, 0. "The English Question," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 36(1), pages 37-56.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Quinn, 2013. "New Labour’s regional experiment: Lessons from the East Midlands," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(7-8), pages 738-751, November.
    2. James Mitchell, 2002. "England and the Centre," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 757-765.
    3. Allan Cochrane, 2012. "Making up a Region: The Rise and Fall of the ‘South East of England’ as a Political Territory," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 95-108, February.
    4. Charlie Jeffery & John Mawson, 2002. "Introduction: Beyond the White Paper on the English Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 715-720.
    5. repec:cep:spccrp:02 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. John Harrison, 2012. "Life after Regions? The Evolution of City-regionalism in England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(9), pages 1243-1259, October.
    7. Kevin Morgan, 2002. "English Question: Regional Perspectives on a Fractured Nation," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 797-810.
    8. John Harrison, 2013. "Configuring the New 'Regional World': On being Caught between Territory and Networks," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 55-74, January.
    9. Danson Mike & Gordon MacLeod & Gerry Mooney, 2012. "Devolution and the Shifting Political Economic Geographies of the United Kingdom Introduction and Context," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 1-9, February.
    10. Amy Glasmeier, 2006. "Book reviews," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(7), pages 801-809.
    11. Mark Sandford, 2002. "What Place for England in an Asymmetrically Devolved UK?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 789-796.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:16:y:2001:i:4:p:312-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.