IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jousus/v14y2020i2p190-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Emotional Experience of Sustainability Courses: Learned Eco-Anxiety, Potential Ontological Adjustment

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Graham

    (Peter Graham is with the Loyola College for Diversity and Sustainability, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.)

  • Cassandra Kuyvenhoven

    (Cassandra Kuyvenhoven is with at the School of Environmental Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada.)

  • Rena Upitis

    (Rena Upitis is with the Faculty of Education, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada.)

  • Adeela Arshad-Ayaz

    (Adeela Arshad-Ayaz is with the Department of Education, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.)

  • Eli Scheinman

    (Eli Scheinman is with the School of Environmental Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada.)

  • Colin Khan

    (Colin Khan is with the School of Environmental Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada.)

  • Allison Goebel

    (Allison Goebel is with the School of Environmental Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada.)

  • R. Stephen Brown

    (R. Stephen Brown is with the School of Environmental Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada.)

  • Alice Hovorka

    (Alice Hovorka is with the Faculty of Environmental and Urban Change, York University, Toronto ON, Canada.)

Abstract

The knowledge content of university-level introductory sustainability courses elicits emotional reactions by students that are novel within the typical classroom context. Common negative reactions include ‘sadness’, ‘worry’, ‘guilt’ and ‘disgust’, while more positive responses include ‘feeling angry’, ‘empowered’, ‘like trying to make a difference’ or ‘having raised awareness’. These emotions are indexical of a deeper social epistemic collision between historically established social identities, including behavioural scripts consistent with, and generative of, unsustainability on the one hand, and a growing collective awareness of the consequent unsustainability that threatens students’ future well-being on the other. The authors argue that introductory sustainability courses set up the potential for not only a learned eco-anxiety, but also an ontological adjustment. That adjustment might bring student, historical inheritance and environment from a state of living in a suffering, but still separate, world to a practice of becoming with a world into which we extend and that also extends into us. Therefore, it is arguably important for instructors to be aware of the possibility of students getting into a negative state of eco-anxiety and for instructors to also have some tools for supporting a more positive ontological adjustment. We recommend that they become skilled in facilitating transformational learning by including some discussions about the ontology of self in any introductory sustainability instruction. Directing students’ attention to their own emotional responses can also be useful for grounding such classroom discussions and transformational learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Graham & Cassandra Kuyvenhoven & Rena Upitis & Adeela Arshad-Ayaz & Eli Scheinman & Colin Khan & Allison Goebel & R. Stephen Brown & Alice Hovorka, 2020. "The Emotional Experience of Sustainability Courses: Learned Eco-Anxiety, Potential Ontological Adjustment," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 14(2), pages 190-204, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jousus:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:190-204
    DOI: 10.1177/0973408220981163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0973408220981163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0973408220981163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jousus:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:190-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.