IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v62y2025i5p1597-1608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political violence in a polarized democracy: Years of Lead (YoL) data on Italy 1969–1988

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Costalli

    (Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Florence, Italy)

  • Daniele Guariso

    (The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK)

  • Patricia Justino

    (United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki, Finland)

  • Andrea Ruggeri

    (Department of Social and Political Sciences, University of Milan, Italy)

Abstract

What are the violent repertoires of politics in democracies? We contend that political violence in democratic settings can take many forms. We offer new guidelines and conceptual insights to enhance our understanding of political violence in democracies and promote a more comprehensive study of it. We provide new empirical evidence on patterns of political violence in a polarized democracy, relative trends, repertoires of violence, and the state’s responses. Our novel dataset on political violence covers the period of Italian history between 1969 and 1988, also known as the Years of Lead (Anni di Piombo). The dataset is based on a triangulation of news sources and an ‘actor-action-target’ analytical framework. We collected over 7,800 geolocated and temporally coded events, shedding light on an understudied but extremely violent period in Italian history. We contend that scholars should avoid conceptualizing political violence in democratic societies as a residual phenomenon, often narrowly framed as mere terrorism due to normative biases and analytical constraints. Instead, a broader perspective is necessary to fully understand its complexity and implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Costalli & Daniele Guariso & Patricia Justino & Andrea Ruggeri, 2025. "Political violence in a polarized democracy: Years of Lead (YoL) data on Italy 1969–1988," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(5), pages 1597-1608, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:62:y:2025:i:5:p:1597-1608
    DOI: 10.1177/00223433251347762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00223433251347762
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00223433251347762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:62:y:2025:i:5:p:1597-1608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.