IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v62y2025i3p799-811.html

Bearing witness: Introducing the Perceived Mass Atrocities Dataset (PMAD)

Author

Listed:
  • Collin J Meisel

    (Frederick S Pardee Institute for International Futures at the University of Denver, USA)

  • Jonathan D Moyer

    (Frederick S Pardee Institute for International Futures at the University of Denver, USA
    Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, USA)

  • Austin S Matthews

    (Department of Political Science, East Carolina University, USA)

  • Oliver Kaplan

    (Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, USA)

  • Ruth Byrnes

    (Frederick S Pardee Institute for International Futures at the University of Denver, USA)

  • Kerent Benjumea

    (Frederick S Pardee Institute for International Futures at the University of Denver, USA)

  • Phoebe Cribb

    (Frederick S Pardee Institute for International Futures at the University of Denver, USA)

  • Collin Van Son

    (Frederick S Pardee Institute for International Futures at the University of Denver, USA)

Abstract

The risk factors and consequences of atrocities are deeply interconnected with questions of intra- and interstate stability and conflict, economic development, colonialism, and gender equality, as well as atrocity crime monitoring and prevention. However, there is no globally comparable measure of lethal and less-lethal atrocities. The Perceived Mass Atrocities Dataset (PMAD) is a country-year measure of atrocities with accompanying narratives. Built to support the US Congress’s Elie Wiesel Genocide and Atrocities Prevention Act of 2018, PMAD enables the systematic comparison of the occurrence and magnitude of seven atrocity types, in addition to group-perpetrated violence against women and LGBTQIA+ groups, with aggregate atrocities indices for 196 countries from 2018 to 2022. PMAD offers a foundation for quantitative studies of atrocities as well as more qualitative, process-focused research of lethal and less-lethal violence with its single, divisible framework. The PMAD data highlight several regions where analysis of atrocities using data on only lethal atrocities would be inadequate, especially Central and Eastern Asia. The data can also facilitate research into the relationships between mass atrocities and gender discrimination, neopatrimonialism, and political polarization.

Suggested Citation

  • Collin J Meisel & Jonathan D Moyer & Austin S Matthews & Oliver Kaplan & Ruth Byrnes & Kerent Benjumea & Phoebe Cribb & Collin Van Son, 2025. "Bearing witness: Introducing the Perceived Mass Atrocities Dataset (PMAD)," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(3), pages 799-811, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:62:y:2025:i:3:p:799-811
    DOI: 10.1177/00223433241249333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00223433241249333
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00223433241249333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Butcher & Benjamin E. Goldsmith & Sascha Nanlohy & Arcot Sowmya & David Muchlinski, 2020. "Introducing the Targeted Mass Killing Data Set for the Study and Forecasting of Mass Atrocities," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(7-8), pages 1524-1547, August.
    2. Harff, Barbara, 2003. "No Lessons Learned from the Holocaust? Assessing Risks of Genocide and Political Mass Murder since 1955," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 97(1), pages 57-73, February.
    3. Andreas Beger & Daniel Hill Jr, 2019. "Examining repressive and oppressive state violence using the Ill-Treatment and Torture data," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(6), pages 626-644, November.
    4. Meghan Garrity, 2022. "Introducing the Government-Sponsored Mass Expulsion Dataset," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(5), pages 767-776, September.
    5. Leila Demarest & Arnim Langer, 2022. "How Events Enter (or Not) Data Sets: The Pitfalls and Guidelines of Using Newspapers in the Study of Conflict," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(2), pages 632-666, May.
    6. William Easterly & Roberta Gatti & Sergio Kurlat, 2006. "Development, democracy, and mass killings," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 129-156, June.
    7. Logan Dumaine & Ragnhild Nordås & Maria Gargiulo & Elisabeth Jean Wood, 2022. "Repertoires of conflict-related sexual violence: Introducing the RSVAC data package," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(4), pages 611-621, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chyanda Querido, 2009. "State-Sponsored Mass Killing in African Wars—Greed or Grievance?," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 15(3), pages 351-361, August.
    2. Charles Anderton & Jurgen Brauer, 2014. "Economics of Genocide and International Law," Working Papers 1409, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.
    3. Freire, Danilo & Uzonyi, Gary, 2018. "What Drives State-Sponsored Violence?: Evidence from Extreme Bounds Analysis and Ensemble Learning Models," SocArXiv pzx3q, Center for Open Science.
    4. Joan Esteban & Massimo Morelli & Dominic Rohner, 2015. "Strategic Mass Killings," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 123(5), pages 1087-1132.
    5. Andrea L. Everett, 2016. "Post-Cold War complex humanitarian emergencies: Introducing a new dataset," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(3), pages 311-339, July.
    6. Charles H. Anderton & Jurgen Brauer, 2024. "Violence against noncombatant civilians in revolutionary conflicts: A psychosocial choice model and empirical tests, 1960–2018," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 200(3), pages 627-647, September.
    7. Attiat F. Ott & Sang Hoo Bae, 2011. "Modeling Mass Killing: For Gain or Ethnic Cleansing?," Chapters, in: Derek L. Braddon & Keith Hartley (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Conflict, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Jose G. Montalvo & Marta Reynal‐Querol, 2008. "Discrete Polarisation with an Application to the Determinants of Genocides," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(533), pages 1835-1865, November.
    9. Anderton Charles H. & Carter John R., 2015. "A New Look at Weak State Conditions and Genocide Risk," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 1-36, January.
    10. Meghan Garrity, 2022. "Introducing the Government-Sponsored Mass Expulsion Dataset," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(5), pages 767-776, September.
    11. Charles H. Anderton & Jurgen Brauer, 2021. "Mass Atrocities and Their Prevention," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 59(4), pages 1240-1292, December.
    12. Becker, Sascha O. & Mukand, Sharun & Yotzov, Ivan, 2022. "Persecution, pogroms and genocide: A conceptual framework and new evidence," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    13. Anderton Charles H. & Anderton Roxane A., 2021. "The Trade Disruption Hypothesis Fails for State-Sponsored Genocides and Mass Atrocities: Why It Matters," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 27(2), pages 143-168, May.
    14. Henk-Jan Brinkman & Cullen S. Hendrix, 2010. "Food Insecurity and Conflict," World Bank Publications - Reports 27510, The World Bank Group.
    15. Daniel Krcmaric, 2018. "Varieties of civil war and mass killing," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(1), pages 18-31, January.
    16. Alexander B. Downes, 2007. "Restraint or Propellant? Democracy and Civilian Fatalities in Interstate Wars," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 51(6), pages 872-904, December.
    17. Stephen McLoughlin, 2015. "Understanding Mass Atrocity Prevention during Periods of Democratic Transition," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 27-41.
    18. Christoph Valentin Steinert, 2023. "The duration of political imprisonment: Evidence from China," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(4), pages 349-372, July.
    19. Carl Müller-Crepon & Guy Schvitz & Lars-Erik Cederman, 2025. "“Right-Peopling†the State: Nationalism, Historical Legacies, and Ethnic Cleansing in Europe, 1886-2020," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 69(2-3), pages 211-241, March.
    20. Kimberly R Frugé, 2019. "Repressive agent defections: How power, costs, and uncertainty influence military behavior and state repression," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(6), pages 591-607, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:62:y:2025:i:3:p:799-811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.