IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v55y2018i3pnp1-np2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Erratum

Author

Listed:
  • N/A

Abstract

Bader, Julia & Ursula E Daxecker (2015) A Chinese resource curse: The human rights effects of oil export dependence on China versus the United States. Journal of PeaceResearch 52(6): 774–790. DOI: 10.1177/0022343315593332 . Author note Our article uses trade data from COMTRADE to compare the human rights implications of oil exports to China versus to the United States from 1992 to 2010. Unfortunately, we made a mistake when merging the oil trade data for the USA. Oil trade data for the USA were erroneously based on a more inclusive commodity code categorization than what is described in the article, including not only crude petroleum oils and oils from bituminous minerals (HS92 classification, commodity code 2709), but also mineral fuels, oils, and products of their distillation (HS92 classification, commodity code 27). We apologize for this mistake. To assess the implications of this error, we have retrieved the correctly categorized data for the USA and replicated our analysis. Our results remain robust (see Table I corrected below). As in the article, we find a robust, negative effect of oil exports to the USA on exporter human rights. In contrast, exports to China have no effects on human rights. There is a small difference for results in Model 3, which interacts oil export variables with oil discoveries. This model now produces a positive and significant coefficient for exports to China in the absence of discoveries, but this finding is not inconsistent with the article’s claims regarding the potentially more benign effects of oil exports to China. Table I (corrected). Ordered logit regressions of oil exports to China and the USA, 1992–2010 Variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Exports/capita Exports/GDP Discoveries First differences Generalized ordinal logit Exclude non-oil Repression t –1 1.115** 1.120** 0.899** –0.622** 1.089** 1.175** (0.054) (0.054) (0.064) (0.041) (0.053) (0.080) Exports to China per capita, logged t –1 0.070 0.146* 0.063 0.080 (0.048) (0.059) (0.046) (0.049) Exports to USA per capita, logged t –1 –0.094* –0.152** –0.088** –0.085* (0.040) (0.050) (0.034) (0.040) Exports to China/GDP, logged t –1 5.512 (3.771) Exports to USA/GDP, logged t –1 –6.829* (2.859) New discovery, logged t –1 0.016 (0.398) Exports to China*Discovery t –1 –0.089 (0.140) Exports to USA*Discovery t –1 0.228** (0.081) D. Exports to China per capita, logged t –1 0.121 (0.075) D. Exports to USA per capita, logged t –1 –0.029 (0.065) Democracy t –1 0.604** 0.583** 0.587** 0.705** 0.665** 0.757** (0.112) (0.110) (0.150) (0.110) (0.112) (0.151) GDP, logged t –1 0.362** (0.055) 0.344** (0.051) 0.401** (0.084) 0.286** (0.051) 0.412** (0.082) Population, logged t –1 –0.271** –0.275** –0.321** –0.276** – 0.269** (0.039) (0.039) (0.052) (0.038) (0.052) Civil war –1.431** –1.394** –1.575** –1.627** – 1.586** (0.191) (0.187) (0.232) (0.203) (0.263) Observations 2,773 2,773 1,471 2,610 2,773 1,450 Standard errors clustered by country in parentheses. Year fixed effects not reported. ** p

Suggested Citation

  • N/A, 2018. "Erratum," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(3), pages 1-2, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:55:y:2018:i:3:p:np1-np2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/55/3/NP1.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:55:y:2018:i:3:p:np1-np2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.