IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v47y2010i2p205-215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The spoiler effect: Framing attitudes and expectations toward peace

Author

Listed:
  • Thamir Sheafer

    () (Department of Communication and Department of Political Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem)

  • Shira Dvir-Gvirsman

    (Department of Communication, Hebrew University of Jerusalem)

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of media framing on aggregate attitudes and expectations of Israelis toward the Oslo peace process with the Palestinians during a time period of eight years (1995-2003). It presents three main contributions: First, it provides a long-term analysis of the impact of media coverage of a peace process on public opinion, while controlling for the influence of real life events. Second, it presents empirical evidence that the strength of media framing effects varies among different facets of public opinion. Specifically, framing effects are stronger on aggregate future expectations compared with their effects on aggregate current attitudes. The fact that the information transmitted by the media evaluative tone was a central source of influence on future expectations underlines the central role of the media in political and social phenomena. Third, in line with previous studies, it shows that the public response to negative framing is much stronger than to positive framing. This may have a negative effect on a government's ability to rally the public in support of a peace process. Since most media coverage of the peace process and conflict focused on negative developments while ignoring positive ones, the media effect on public opinion was that of peace spoilers.

Suggested Citation

  • Thamir Sheafer & Shira Dvir-Gvirsman, 2010. "The spoiler effect: Framing attitudes and expectations toward peace," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 47(2), pages 205-215, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:47:y:2010:i:2:p:205-215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/47/2/205.abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:47:y:2010:i:2:p:205-215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.