IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v22y2025i4p387-404.html

Beyond visual range air combat simulations: validation methods and analysis using agent-based models

Author

Listed:
  • André Rossi Kuroswiski
  • Felipe Leonardo Lôbo Medeiros
  • Monica Maria De Marchi
  • Angelo Passaro

Abstract

Computer simulations have revolutionized the analysis of military scenarios. As computing power has advanced, simulations can now incorporate intricate tactical-level engagements. However, accurately representing actors’ decisions at this level poses new challenges for developing and validating these simulations. In this context, this paper presents the methodologies and lessons learned from a study conducted to assess the application of agent-based modeling and simulation (ABMS) in analyzing beyond visual range (BVR) air combat scenarios, focusing on the influence of agent behavior on the outcomes. The proposed approach integrates real pilots into a face validation phase to examine symmetric and asymmetric engagements. The results underscore the significance of agent behaviors for the outcomes, for example, showing how specific behaviors are capable of mitigating the advantages of superior weaponry. Furthermore, the research explores the dynamics of aircraft acting in pairs, demonstrating the potential to evaluate tactics and the impact of numerical advantage. Ultimately, the results enhance the simulations’ credibility and confirm their plausibility, in line with the face validation methodology. This powerful phase bolsters subsequent steps in the overall validation process. In addition, the findings show how specific configurations of the agents, including tactical coordination, can significantly affect the simulation outcomes and validity.

Suggested Citation

  • André Rossi Kuroswiski & Felipe Leonardo Lôbo Medeiros & Monica Maria De Marchi & Angelo Passaro, 2025. "Beyond visual range air combat simulations: validation methods and analysis using agent-based models," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 22(4), pages 387-404, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:387-404
    DOI: 10.1177/15485129231211915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15485129231211915
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/15485129231211915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C M Macal, 2016. "Everything you need to know about agent-based modelling and simulation," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 144-156, May.
    2. Jaeyeong Lee & Sunwoo Shin & Moonsung Park & Chongman Kim, 2018. "Agent-Based Simulation and Its Application to Analyze Combat Effectiveness in Network-Centric Warfare Considering Communication Failure Environments," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-9, December.
    3. Ju-Sung Lee & Tatiana Filatova & Arika Ligmann-Zielinska & Behrooz Hassani-Mahmooei & Forrest Stonedahl & Iris Lorscheid & Alexey Voinov & J. Gareth Polhill & Zhanli Sun & Dawn C. Parker, 2015. "The Complexities of Agent-Based Modeling Output Analysis," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(4), pages 1-4.
    4. Kevin L Foster & Mikel D Petty, 2021. "Estimating the tactical impact of robot swarms using a semi-automated forces system and design of experiments methods," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 18(3), pages 247-269, July.
    5. R G Sargent, 2013. "Verification and validation of simulation models," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 12-24, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giacomo Ravaioli & Tiago Domingos & Ricardo F. M. Teixeira, 2023. "A Framework for Data-Driven Agent-Based Modelling of Agricultural Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Alexander L Martinez & Lance E Champagne & Phillip M LaCasse, 2026. "Simulating autonomous drone behaviors in an anti-access area denial (A2AD) environment," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 23(2), pages 325-334, April.
    3. Ernesto Carrella & Richard M. Bailey & Jens Koed Madsen, 2018. "Indirect inference through prediction," Papers 1807.01579, arXiv.org.
    4. repec:osf:agrixi:xutyz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Andrei I. Vlad & Alexei A. Romanyukha & Tatiana E. Sannikova, 2024. "Parameter Tuning of Agent-Based Models: Metaheuristic Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Corrado Monti & Marco Pangallo & Gianmarco De Francisci Morales & Francesco Bonchi, 2022. "On learning agent-based models from data," Papers 2205.05052, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    7. Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea & Sani, Amir, 2018. "Agent-based model calibration using machine learning surrogates," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 366-389.
    8. Giorgio Fagiolo & Mattia Guerini & Francesco Lamperti & Alessio Moneta & Andrea Roventini, 2017. "Validation of Agent-Based Models in Economics and Finance," LEM Papers Series 2017/23, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    9. Zila, Eric & Kukacka, Jiri, 2023. "Moment set selection for the SMM using simple machine learning," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 366-391.
    10. Patrick Afflerbach & Christopher Dun & Henner Gimpel & Dominik Parak & Johannes Seyfried, 2021. "A Simulation-Based Approach to Understanding the Wisdom of Crowds Phenomenon in Aggregating Expert Judgment," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(4), pages 329-348, August.
    11. Huber, Robert & Bakker, Martha & Balmann, Alfons & Berger, Thomas & Bithell, Mike & Brown, Calum & Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne & Xiong, Hang & Le, Quang Bao & Mack, Gabriele & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Millingt, 2018. "Representation of decision-making in European agricultural agent-based models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 143-160.
    12. Hossein Sabzian & Mohammad Ali Shafia & Ali Maleki & Seyeed Mostapha Seyeed Hashemi & Ali Baghaei & Hossein Gharib, 2019. "Theories and Practice of Agent based Modeling: Some practical Implications for Economic Planners," Papers 1901.08932, arXiv.org.
    13. Kailun Feng & Weizhuo Lu & Thomas Olofsson & Shiwei Chen & Hui Yan & Yaowu Wang, 2018. "A Predictive Environmental Assessment Method for Construction Operations: Application to a Northeast China Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.
    14. Ye, Xu & Wang, Yu & Shafiee, Sara, 2024. "An iterative consumer-centric and technology-driven product innovation strategy based on selective and dynamic consumer attention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    15. Risso, Lucas Antonio & Ganga, Gilberto Miller Devós & Santa-Eulalia, Luis Antonio de & Godinho Filho, Moacir & Chikhi, Tinhinane & Mosconi, Elaine & Zhang, Kaiwen, 2024. "A framework for modeling and simulating blockchain-based supply chain traceability systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    16. José M. Gaspar, 2018. "Erratum to “Bridging the Gap between Economic Modelling and Simulation: A Simple Dynamic Aggregate Demand‐Aggregate Supply Model with Matlab”," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2018(1).
    17. Niamir, Leila & Filatova, Tatiana & Voinov, Alexey & Bressers, Hans, 2018. "Transition to low-carbon economy: Assessing cumulative impacts of individual behavioral changes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 325-345.
    18. Kremmydas, Dimitris & Athanasiadis, Ioannis N. & Rozakis, Stelios, 2018. "A review of Agent Based Modeling for agricultural policy evaluation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 95-106.
    19. Kamila Štekerová & Josef Zelenka & Milan Kořínek, 2022. "Agent-Based Modelling in Visitor Management of Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Thomas, Spencer A. & Lloyd, David J.B. & Skeldon, Anne C., 2016. "Equation-free analysis of agent-based models and systematic parameter determination," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 464(C), pages 27-53.
    21. Ernesto Carrella, 2021. "No Free Lunch when Estimating Simulation Parameters," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 24(2), pages 1-7.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:387-404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.