IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v22y2025i2p187-195.html

A stochastic jump model applied to collaborative queue-based high energy laser defense

Author

Listed:
  • Mitchell M Kracman

Abstract

High energy lasers (HELs) are evolving to provide an effective solution for air and missile defense. The emergence of this technology comes at a similar time to the development of cooperative and collaborative defense systems that collect and communicate data to inform decisions. This paper proposes a stochastic jump method for modeling the performance of networked HELs, defending against aerial threats which follow a queueing methodology. By drawing on an existing method that quantifies performance using the sum of sojourn times in a stochastic jump process, the model can predict the probability of survival when multiple effectors are tasked in defending against an arbitrary number of threats. The model can be applied more generally to processes with both waiting time–dependent service and finite existence. Furthermore, a new HEL counteraction probability model is developed to enable the demonstration and comparison of three different system collaboration methods in a future warfare application. Results suggest the prevailing superimposing laser strategy may be less effective than simple one-to-one allocation of lasers to threats. There may also be merit in targeting separate components of a threat’s structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitchell M Kracman, 2025. "A stochastic jump model applied to collaborative queue-based high energy laser defense," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 22(2), pages 187-195, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:187-195
    DOI: 10.1177/15485129231161092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15485129231161092
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/15485129231161092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doo Il Choi & Charles Knessl & Charles Tier, 1999. "A queueing system with queue length dependent service times, with applications to cell discarding in ATM networks," International Journal of Stochastic Analysis, Hindawi, vol. 12, pages 1-28, January.
    2. L. Kleinrock, 1964. "A delay dependent queue discipline," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3‐4), pages 329-341, September.
    3. Marcel F. Neuts & David M. Lucantoni, 1979. "A Markovian Queue with N Servers Subject to Breakdowns and Repairs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(9), pages 849-861, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Freek Verdonck & Herwig Bruneel & Sabine Wittevrongel, 2021. "Delay in a 2-State Discrete-Time Queue with Stochastic State-Period Lengths and State-Dependent Server Availability and Arrivals," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Sheng Zhu & Xuege Han & Jinting Wang & Zhongbin Wang, 2026. "Performance evaluation and equilibrium strategies for a mixed priority queueing system," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 110(1), pages 1-32, March.
    3. K. R. Rejitha & K. P. Jose, 2018. "A stochastic inventory system with two modes of service and retrial of customers," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(1), pages 134-149, March.
    4. Zhang, Zhengmin & Gong, Yeming & Yuan, Zhe & Chen, Wanying, 2024. "Robotic warehouse systems considering dynamic priority," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Veeraruna Kavitha & Jayakrishnan Nair & Raman Kumar Sinha, 2019. "Pseudo conservation for partially fluid, partially lossy queueing systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(2), pages 255-292, June.
    6. Yonatan Shadmi, 2022. "Fluid limits for shortest job first with aging," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 93-112, June.
    7. Dudin, Alexander & Kim, Chesoong & Dudin, Sergey & Dudina, Olga, 2015. "Priority retrial queueing model operating in random environment with varying number and reservation of servers," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 674-690.
    8. Moshe Haviv, 2025. "Balancing of the C-mu rule by intermediate priorities," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Pedram Sahba & Bariş Balciog̃lu & Dragan Banjevic, 2013. "Analysis of the finite‐source multiclass priority queue with an unreliable server and setup time," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(4), pages 331-342, June.
    10. Miaomiao Yu & Yinghui Tang, 2022. "Analysis of a renewal batch arrival queue with a fault-tolerant server using shift operator method," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2831-2858, July.
    11. Na Li & David A. Stanford & Peter Taylor & Ilze Ziedins, 2017. "Nonlinear Accumulating Priority Queues with Equivalent Linear Proxies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1712-1721, December.
    12. Yunan Liu & Xu Sun & Kyle Hovey, 2022. "Scheduling to Differentiate Service in a Multiclass Service System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(1), pages 527-544, January.
    13. Liu, Gia-Shie, 2011. "Dynamic group instantaneous replacement policies for unreliable Markovian service systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 203-217, April.
    14. Moshe, Shir & Oz, Binyamin, 2023. "Charging more for priority via two-part tariff for accumulating priorities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 652-660.
    15. Gia-Shie Liu, 2019. "A Group Replacement Decision Support System Based on Internet of Things," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-23, September.
    16. António Pacheco & Helena Ribeiro, 2008. "Consecutive customer losses in oscillating GI X /M//n systems with state dependent services rates," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 143-158, September.
    17. Val Andrei Fajardo & Steve Drekic, 2017. "Waiting Time Distributions in the Preemptive Accumulating Priority Queue," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 255-284, March.
    18. Nadav Lavi & Hanoch Levy, 2020. "Admit or preserve? Addressing server failures in cloud computing task management," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 279-325, April.
    19. Buyun Li & Vincent W. Slaugh, 2026. "Capacity Planning for Resource Turnaround Operations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 440-458, March.
    20. Binyamin Oz & Seva Shneer & Ilze Ziedins, 2022. "Queueing models for addictive tasks," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 325-327, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:187-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.