IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v21y2024i2p149-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supporting shipboard helicopter flight testing with simulation and metrics for predicting pilot workload

Author

Listed:
  • Perry Comeau
  • Alanna Wall
  • Eric Thornhill
  • Sean McTavish
  • Richard Lee

Abstract

Shipboard helicopter operations are much more challenging and complex than land-based operations due to many factors associated with the presence of the ship. To determine those conditions in which safe operations may occur, a First of Class Flight Trial (FOCFT) is conducted for every new ship–helicopter pair. This trial results in a Ship–Helicopter Operating Limit (SHOL) envelope that is used to document operational limits for regular operations. Conducting a FOCFT is a, expensive, and time-consuming task that requires testing all aspects of operations. Modeling and simulation efforts to support shipboard helicopter operations have been ongoing internationally for many years with the intention of de-risking FOCFT and introducing efficiency into the testing process. Canada will be accepting several new ship classes into its fleet over the next two decades. In support of FOCFT for these new ships, modeling and simulation tools are being developed by the National Research Council (NRC) Canada and Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) and significant advancements have occurred in the past decade. As part of this work, NRC and DRDC now use a framework and analysis approach that is intended to standardize SHOL testing with the use of modeling and simulation. This paper introduces that framework and gives details on the modeling and simulation tools that can be used to reduce risk and increase efficiency for Canada’s upcoming FOCFTs.

Suggested Citation

  • Perry Comeau & Alanna Wall & Eric Thornhill & Sean McTavish & Richard Lee, 2024. "Supporting shipboard helicopter flight testing with simulation and metrics for predicting pilot workload," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 21(2), pages 149-170, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:149-170
    DOI: 10.1177/15485129221118937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15485129221118937
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/15485129221118937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:149-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.