IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v19y2022i4p649-657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Radiological urban threat due to special protective actions from security forces

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana SC Castro
  • André Luiz Q Reis
  • Ricardo M Stenders
  • Isabela Santos Alves
  • Jose Carlos C Amorim
  • Ademir Xavier da Silva
  • Edson R Andrade

Abstract

The neutralization of suspicious objects by a conventional explosion in public places seems to be an option often considered by security forces. A radiological dispersive device (RDD) uses a radioactive material coupled to an amount of conventional explosive in order to contaminate an area. Extremist groups may take advantage of such protocol by leaving the radioactive material in public places to provoke suspicion, thus leading to the neutralization by an explosion, which in turn creates a RDD event. This work aims to discuss the influence of such a protocol in the radiological threat by means of computational simulation. The total maximum effective dose equivalent (TEDE Max), the Pasquill–Gifford atmospheric stability classes (PG classes), and the potentially affected population size were evaluated. The results consider two radionuclides Cs-137 and Sr-90. The findings allow us to infer that TEDE Max and surface contamination are strongly dependent on the PG classes. In addition, the affected population size depends on the plume size, which seems to be independent of the radionuclide, but not of the PG classes. Therefore, PG classes play a key role in the radiological threat. The findings may be of value to support decisions when facing an event.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana SC Castro & André Luiz Q Reis & Ricardo M Stenders & Isabela Santos Alves & Jose Carlos C Amorim & Ademir Xavier da Silva & Edson R Andrade, 2022. "Radiological urban threat due to special protective actions from security forces," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 19(4), pages 649-657, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:649-657
    DOI: 10.1177/15485129211016539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15485129211016539
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/15485129211016539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:649-657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.