IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jothpo/v9y1997i4p503-532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between Quiescence and Rebellion Among the Peasantry

Author

Listed:
  • Leslie Anderson

Abstract

This essay is a theoretical and empirical test of two major theories of peasant political action, James Scott's Moral Economy of the Peasant and Samuel Popkin's The Rational Peasant. The essay draws primarily upon testimony taken from peasant activists involved in a wide range of different forms of political action. The essay goes on to operationalize core elements from each of these two theories and to compare them statistically to determine which is stronger in explaining different types of peasant political action. The qualitative and quantitative findings show that Scott's theory is stronger when explaining choices of extreme action such as rebellion whereas Popkin's theory is primarily important with respect to tactics of collective nonviolence. Both theories and both kinds of motivation are needed to provide an explanation for the full range of possible peasant political actions. The conclusion points toward a need for a more comprehensive and inclusive theory of political motivation incorporating both self-interested and community-oriented types of motivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Leslie Anderson, 1997. "Between Quiescence and Rebellion Among the Peasantry," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 9(4), pages 503-532, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:9:y:1997:i:4:p:503-532
    DOI: 10.1177/0951692897009004004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0951692897009004004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0951692897009004004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:9:y:1997:i:4:p:503-532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.