IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jothpo/v4y1992i1p93-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concepts and Skocpol: Ambiguity and Vagueness in the Study of Revolution

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander J. Motyl

Abstract

In a 1980 article discussing historical and theoretical developments in the study of revolution, Jack Goldstone distinguished among three `generations' and suggested that the work of the third, as typified by Theda Skocpol, represented an advance on those that preceded it. This paper argues the opposite by critically analyzing the work that has defined most third-generation scholarship, States and Social Revolutions . The reasons for Skocpol's inability to transcend earlier scholarship are to be found in her casual approach to conceptual clarity, specifically in her tendency to indulge in ambiguity and vagueness with respect to the central concepts of the book - structure, state, potential autonomy, crisis and revolution. In light of these conceptual problems, I propose a possible conceptual solution to the problems besetting the study of revolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander J. Motyl, 1992. "Concepts and Skocpol: Ambiguity and Vagueness in the Study of Revolution," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 4(1), pages 93-112, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:4:y:1992:i:1:p:93-112
    DOI: 10.1177/0951692892004001005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0951692892004001005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0951692892004001005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:4:y:1992:i:1:p:93-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.