IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jospec/v27y2026i6p631-654.html

Searching for the Queen's Gambit: An Analysis of Male-Female Performance Gaps in U.S. Chess

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Kisida
  • Matthew Pepper
  • Michael Podgursky
  • Michelle Wickman

Abstract

We examine male-female rating gaps for young chess players using two decades of data from the U.S. Chess Federation. A contribution of our study is that we analyze the evolution of male-female gaps across a broad range of chess ratings, from novice to advanced. We find large gaps favoring males at entry and beyond across all percentiles of the ratings distribution. We find similar returns to tournament experience for males and females. Although female players have higher attrition rates than males, the net effect of this differential attrition on population ratings gaps is null. We find some evidence that male-female rating gaps at entry narrow modestly as female participation in the home locale rises – an effect that is generally stronger for weaker players. The key explanation for male-female differences in the population are ratings gaps at entry, which are large when first observed and persist over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Kisida & Matthew Pepper & Michael Podgursky & Michelle Wickman, 2026. "Searching for the Queen's Gambit: An Analysis of Male-Female Performance Gaps in U.S. Chess," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 27(6), pages 631-654, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jospec:v:27:y:2026:i:6:p:631-654
    DOI: 10.1177/15270025261438415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15270025261438415
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/15270025261438415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jospec:v:27:y:2026:i:6:p:631-654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.