IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v69y2025i10p1741-1768.html

Multidimensional Identity Cleavages and Religious Discrimination

Author

Listed:
  • Nikola Mirilovic
  • Ariel Zellman
  • Jonathan Fox

Abstract

To what extent does minority distinctiveness from the majority mitigate or exacerbate discrimination? Similarities between majority and minority groups may reduce societal and political discrimination. Yet shared identities along one cleavage coupled with distinctive characteristics along another may also render commonalities salient for inter-group competition and conflict. We examine how cross-cuttingness of group-level religious identity with ethnicity, geographic concentration, and economic class influences societal religious discrimination (SRD) and governmental religious discrimination (GRD) against religious minorities at the state level. We find that greater cross-cuttingness of religion and ethnicity leads to decreased SRD and GRD. Yet while more cross-cutting geographic distributions of religious groups correlate with lower SRD and higher GRD, greater economic cross-cuttingness between religious groups correlates with higher SRD and lower GRD. These findings offer a nuanced theoretical and empirical bridge to understand discrimination, as social and political behaviors between individual expressions of societal prejudice and intergroup violent conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikola Mirilovic & Ariel Zellman & Jonathan Fox, 2025. "Multidimensional Identity Cleavages and Religious Discrimination," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 69(10), pages 1741-1768, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:69:y:2025:i:10:p:1741-1768
    DOI: 10.1177/00220027251324465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00220027251324465
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00220027251324465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helbling, Marc & Traunmüller, Richard, 2016. "How state support of religion shapes attitudes toward Muslim immigrants: New evidence from a sub-national comparison," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 49(3), pages 391-424.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luigi M. Solivetti, 2024. "Muslim immigrants and perceived discrimination in Europe: a comparative analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1859-1879, April.
    2. Al-Raggad Abdallah Kalaf, 2025. "Administrative Law’s Role in Protecting Ethnic and Religious Minorities: Legal Mechanisms, Policy Challenges, and Future Directions," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 19(2), pages 35-55.
    3. Helbling, Marc & Traunmüller, Richard, 2020. "What is Islamophobia? Disentangling Citizens’ Feelings Toward Ethnicity, Religion and Religiosity Using a Survey Experiment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50(3), pages 811-828.
    4. Dorkhanov, Ilia & Sokolov, Boris, 2025. "Denomination, Religiosity and Anti-Immigrant Attitudes in Europe: Comparative Evidence from the European Social Survey," OSF Preprints q96fe_v1, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:69:y:2025:i:10:p:1741-1768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.