IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v66y2022i9p1703-1730.html

Violent Political Protest: Introducing a New Uppsala Conflict Data Program Data Set on Organized Violence, 1989-2019

Author

Listed:
  • Isak Svensson
  • Susanne Schaftenaar
  • Marie Allansson

Abstract

This article presents the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) “Violent Political Protest†(VPP) data set: a new –standalone- category of organized violence, which complements, and is compatible with, UCDP’s three categories of organized violence: one-sided violence, non-state, and state-based conflict. It consists of violent political protests, with at least 25 casualties during a year, in which informally organized civilians challenge states over governmental or territorial issues. We describe the data collection process, and demonstrate the data’s use with empirical analyses. Violent political protest is present globally, but most prevalent in the Middle East and Africa, and increasingly common over time. Violent political protest frequently co-occurs with state-based conflicts, but rarely due to conflict escalation. We explore if this is due to shared contexts, and find that gender inequality increases the likelihood of VPP onset, similar to state-based conflicts. Finally, we identify avenues for future research, including using VPP to assist in a more precise and complete analysis of organized violence.

Suggested Citation

  • Isak Svensson & Susanne Schaftenaar & Marie Allansson, 2022. "Violent Political Protest: Introducing a New Uppsala Conflict Data Program Data Set on Organized Violence, 1989-2019," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(9), pages 1703-1730, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:66:y:2022:i:9:p:1703-1730
    DOI: 10.1177/00220027221109791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00220027221109791
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00220027221109791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher, 2011. "Divide and Conquer or Divide and Concede: How Do States Respond to Internally Divided Separatists?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 105(2), pages 275-297, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guicang Peng & Knut Erik Bang & Tore Markeset, 2025. "Country risk mapping in a changing world—comparative survey on academic research and industrial practices," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(2), pages 561-580, February.
    2. Shawn Davies & Therése Pettersson & Margareta Sollenberg & Magnus Öberg, 2025. "Organized violence 1989–2024, and the challenges of identifying civilian victims," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(4), pages 1223-1240, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanne Fjelde & Desirée Nilsson, 2018. "The rise of rebel contenders," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(5), pages 551-565, September.
    2. Gunzelmann, Hans Jonas, 2025. "How critical junctures shape secessionist movement cohesion: Strategies, framing processes, and interorganizational relations before and after the 2017 referendum in Catalonia," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 62(4), pages 961-975.
    3. Flamand, Sabine, 2019. "Partial decentralization as a way to prevent secessionist conflict," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 159-178.
    4. Kirssa Cline Ryckman, 2020. "Lasting peace or temporary calm? Rebel group decapitation and civil war outcomes," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(2), pages 172-192, March.
    5. Corinne Bara & Govinda Clayton, 2023. "Your Reputation Precedes You: Ceasefires and Cooperative Credibility During Civil Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(7-8), pages 1325-1349, August.
    6. Robert Ulrich Nagel & Austin C. Doctor, 2020. "Conflict-related Sexual Violence and Rebel Group Fragmentation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(7-8), pages 1226-1253, August.
    7. Victor Asal & Brian J. Phillips & R. Karl Rethemeyer & Corina Simonelli & Joseph K. Young, 2019. "Carrots, Sticks, and Insurgent Targeting of Civilians," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(7), pages 1710-1735, August.
    8. Nils-Christian Bormann & Burcu Savun, 2018. "Reputation, concessions, and territorial civil war," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(5), pages 671-686, September.
    9. Reinsberg, Bernhard & Kern, Andreas & Rau-Göhring, Matthias, 2021. "The political economy of IMF conditionality and central bank independence," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Gary Uzonyi & Matthew Wells, 2016. "Domestic institutions, leader tenure and the duration of civil war," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(3), pages 294-310, July.
    11. Lesley-Ann Daniels, 2025. "Identity concessions in ethnic civil wars: When are they given and with what outcomes for peace?," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(4), pages 1191-1204, July.
    12. Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, 2017. "Dangerous bargains with the devil? Incorporating new approaches in peace science for the study of war," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(1), pages 98-116, January.
    13. Hans Jonas Gunzelmann, 2025. "How critical junctures shape secessionist movement cohesion: Strategies, framing processes, and interorganizational relations before and after the 2017 referendum in Catalonia," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(4), pages 961-975, July.
    14. Kirssa Cline Ryckman, 2020. "A Turn to Violence: The Escalation of Nonviolent Movements," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(2-3), pages 318-343, February.
    15. Gizelis Theodora-Ismene, 2018. "Systematic Study of Gender, Conflict, and Peace," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 24(4), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Rebecca H. Best & Christine Carpino & Mark J.C. Crescenzi, 2013. "An analysis of the TABARI coding system," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(4), pages 335-348, September.
    17. Hendrix, Cullen & Noland, Marcus, 2023. "The West versus Beijing? Determinants of the UN Human Rights Council vote (not) to debate human rights in Xinjiang," MPRA Paper 118630, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Allard Duursma & Feike Fliervoet, 2021. "Fueling Factionalism? The Impact of Peace Processes on Rebel Group Fragmentation in Civil Wars," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(4), pages 788-812, April.
    19. Erica Chenoweth & Evan Perkoski & Sooyeon Kang, 2017. "State Repression and Nonviolent Resistance," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(9), pages 1950-1969, October.
    20. Leuschner, Elena & Hellmeier, Sebastian, 2024. "State Concessions and Protest Mobilization in Authoritarian Regimes," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 57(1), pages 3-31.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:66:y:2022:i:9:p:1703-1730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.