IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v55y2011i5p683-709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time to Agree: Is Time Pressure Good for Peace Negotiations?

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Pinfari

    () (London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK)

Abstract

This article explores the impact of time pressure on negotiation processes in territorial conflicts in the post-cold war era. While it is often argued that time pressure can help generate positive momentum in peace negotiations and help break deadlocks, extensive literature also suggests that perceived time shortage can have a negative impact on the cognitive processes involved in complex, intercultural negotiations. The analysis explores these hypotheses through a comparison of sixty-eight episodes of negotiation using fuzzy-set logic, a form of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). The conclusions confirm that time pressure can, in certain circumstances, be associated with broad agreements but also that only low levels of time pressure or its absence are associated with durable settlements. The analysis also suggests that the negative effect of time pressure on negotiations is particularly relevant in the presence of complex decision making and when a broad range of debated issues is at stake.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Pinfari, 2011. "Time to Agree: Is Time Pressure Good for Peace Negotiations?," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 55(5), pages 683-709, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:55:y:2011:i:5:p:683-709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/55/5/683.abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    time pressure; deadlines; peace processes; summits;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:55:y:2011:i:5:p:683-709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.